Tsushita Keitaro, Kobayashi Syoko, Uno Saori, Urano Yuko, Ikedo Mayumi
Department of Health Management, Central Office, Aichi Police.
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2022 Mar 25;64(2):107-113. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-006-E. Epub 2021 May 13.
Immediately before the state of emergency was declared, there was an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among special training participants with severe physical stress. For promoting the optimization of infection prevention measures by identifying acts and situations with high risk of infection, we conducted a survey and analysis to understand the detailed process of infection spread in these cases.
A structured interview was conducted for the special training participants on their health status, changes in symptoms, training methods, and behavior history in their private lives. Additionally, a patrol of the training facility was carried out to understand the training environment, and antibody tests were conducted on the close contacts for more accurately grasping the spread of infection, by identifying subclinical infected persons.
Within 10 days of COVID-19 onset in the first patient, 15 of the 19 original training participants developed symptoms, and 14 patients tested positive for RT-PCR. PCR tests were also performed on four patients who did not develop the disease - two were positive and negative, each. The two negatives turned positive on a later antibody test, suggesting that there was an asymptomatic infection. In addition, all five patients who participated in the training for only a day developed symptoms and tested positive for PCR in a few days. Of the 64 people who underwent testing for antibodies as close contacts, all but one who was living together with a patient were negative on antibody testing.
The onset of COVID-19 occurred after the start of practice-based training continuously; therefore, the practice-based training was thought to be the main cause of the transmission. We speculate that the main factors behind the rapid spread of infection are as follows: during practice-based training, increased ventilation made it difficult to wear a mask; repeated loud vocalizations at close range; and the training pair was not fixed. Physical training without shouting and desk work, however, did not possess the risk of COVID-19, and avoiding certain situations at high risk of respiratory infections may have significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission. If personnel become infected with SARS-CoV-2, emergency measures should be devised by identifying patients and close contacts and facilitating the investigation of their behavioral history. Furthermore, evaluating and improving the effectiveness of infection control measures is necessary by ascertaining potentially infected persons by performing PCR tests, antigen tests, antibody tests, etc. in combination.
在宣布进入紧急状态之前,参加高强度体能训练的人员中爆发了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染。为了通过识别高感染风险的行为和情况来促进感染预防措施的优化,我们进行了一项调查和分析,以了解这些病例中感染传播的详细过程。
对参加特训的人员进行了结构化访谈,询问他们的健康状况、症状变化、训练方法以及日常生活中的行为史。此外,对训练设施进行了巡查以了解训练环境,并对密切接触者进行了抗体检测,通过识别亚临床感染者来更准确地掌握感染传播情况。
在首例患者出现COVID-19症状后的10天内,19名最初参加训练的人员中有15人出现症状,14名患者RT-PCR检测呈阳性。对4名未发病的患者也进行了PCR检测,结果2人呈阳性,2人呈阴性。后来这两名阴性患者的抗体检测呈阳性,表明存在无症状感染。此外,仅参加一天训练的5名患者均出现症状,并在数天内PCR检测呈阳性。在作为密切接触者接受抗体检测的64人中,除了一名与患者同住的人外,其他人的抗体检测均为阴性。
COVID-19在基于实践的训练开始后持续发病;因此,基于实践的训练被认为是传播的主要原因。我们推测感染迅速传播的主要因素如下:在基于实践的训练期间,通风增加使得难以佩戴口罩;近距离反复大声呼喊;训练搭档不固定。然而,不呼喊的体能训练和伏案工作不存在COVID-19风险,避免某些呼吸道感染高风险情况可能会显著减少SARS-CoV-2传播。如果人员感染了SARS-CoV-2,应通过识别患者和密切接触者并促进对其行为史的调查来制定应急措施。此外,有必要通过联合进行PCR检测、抗原检测、抗体检测等确定潜在感染者,来评估和提高感染控制措施的有效性。