Gabram S G, Champion H R
Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010.
J Trauma. 1988 Jul;28(7):1060-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198807000-00024.
Four hundred fifteen papers published in the Journal of Trauma from January 1985 through December 1986 were reviewed to document areas of future need. Analyses focused on: 1) the study design of each paper; 2) the quality of scientific reporting in 10% (n = 40) of randomly selected papers from four major study designs; 3) the subject material addressed in 242 trauma-related publications using the categories: acute care, epidemiology, biomechanics, prevention, and rehabilitation. Although the Journal of Trauma provides a consistent edifying mixture of study designs, there is a relative need for less descriptive retrospective/prospective reviews and case reports, and for more observational and interventional cohort designs. More precise documentation of specific research criteria would better substantiate scientific conclusions. In light of the contemporary ranges of issues as defined in Injury In America (1), broader multidisciplinary articles focusing on epidemiology, biomechanics, rehabilitation, and prevention of injury may benefit readers of the Journal of Trauma.
对1985年1月至1986年12月发表在《创伤杂志》上的415篇论文进行了综述,以记录未来的需求领域。分析重点关注:1)每篇论文的研究设计;2)从四种主要研究设计中随机抽取的10%(n = 40)论文的科学报告质量;3)使用急性护理、流行病学、生物力学、预防和康复等类别,对242篇创伤相关出版物中涉及的主题材料进行分析。尽管《创伤杂志》提供了各种研究设计的有益结合,但相对而言,对描述性回顾性/前瞻性综述和病例报告的需求较少,而对观察性和干预性队列设计的需求较多。更精确地记录具体研究标准将更好地证实科学结论。鉴于《美国的伤害》(1)中定义的当代问题范围,关注伤害流行病学、生物力学、康复和预防的更广泛的多学科文章可能会使《创伤杂志》的读者受益。