Sami Musa Basseer, Annibale Luciano, O'Neill Aisling, Collier Tracy, Onyejiaka Chidimma, Eranti Savitha, Das Debasis, Kelbrick Marlene, McGuire Philip, Williams Steve C R, Rana Anas, Ettinger Ulrich, Bhattacharyya Sagnik
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences King's College London, London, UK.
Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham University, Nottingham, England.
NPJ Schizophr. 2021 May 12;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00155-2.
It is unclear whether early psychosis in the context of cannabis use is different from psychosis without cannabis. We investigated this issue by examining whether abnormalities in oculomotor control differ between patients with psychosis with and without a history of cannabis use. We studied four groups: patients in the early phase of psychosis with a history of cannabis use (EPC; n = 28); patients in the early phase of psychosis without (EPNC; n = 25); controls with a history of cannabis use (HCC; n = 16); and controls without (HCNC; n = 22). We studied smooth pursuit eye movements using a stimulus with sinusoidal waveform at three target frequencies (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 Hz). Participants also performed 40 antisaccade trials. There were no differences between the EPC and EPNC groups in diagnosis, symptom severity or level of functioning. We found evidence for a cannabis effect (χ = 23.14, p < 0.001), patient effect (χ = 4.84, p = 0.028) and patient × cannabis effect (χ = 4.20, p = 0.04) for smooth pursuit velocity gain. There was a large difference between EPC and EPNC (g = 0.76-0.86) with impairment in the non cannabis using group. We found no significant effect for antisaccade error whereas patients had fewer valid trials compared to controls. These data indicate that impairment of smooth pursuit in psychosis is more severe in patients without a history of cannabis use. This is consistent with the notion that the severity of neurobiological alterations in psychosis is lower in patients whose illness developed in the context of cannabis use.
目前尚不清楚大麻使用背景下的早期精神病是否与无大麻使用情况的精神病有所不同。我们通过研究有和没有大麻使用史的精神病患者在眼球运动控制方面的异常情况是否存在差异来调查这个问题。我们研究了四组:有大麻使用史的精神病早期患者(EPC;n = 28);无大麻使用史的精神病早期患者(EPNC;n = 25);有大麻使用史的对照组(HCC;n = 16);无大麻使用史的对照组(HCNC;n = 22)。我们使用正弦波形刺激在三个目标频率(0.2、0.4和0.6赫兹)下研究平稳跟踪眼球运动。参与者还进行了40次反扫视试验。EPC组和EPNC组在诊断、症状严重程度或功能水平方面没有差异。我们发现平稳跟踪速度增益存在大麻效应(χ = 23.14,p < 0.001)、患者效应(χ = 4.84,p = 0.028)和患者×大麻效应(χ = 4.20,p = 0.04)。EPC组和EPNC组之间存在很大差异(g = 0.76 - 0.86),非大麻使用组存在损伤。我们发现反扫视误差没有显著影响,而与对照组相比患者的有效试验较少。这些数据表明,无大麻使用史的精神病患者的平稳跟踪损伤更为严重。这与以下观点一致,即在大麻使用背景下发病的患者,其精神病中神经生物学改变的严重程度较低。