• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Practical publication metrics for academics.学者实用出版指标。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1705-1712. doi: 10.1111/cts.13067. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context.研究人员和作者影响力指标:多样性、价值和背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Apr 18;33(18):e139. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e139. eCollection 2018 Apr 30.
3
Measuring the impact of scientific publications and publication extenders: examples of novel approaches.衡量科学出版物及出版物扩充形式的影响力:新方法示例
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Apr;40(4):677-687. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2320849. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Web of Science's Citation Median Metrics Overcome the Major Constraints of the Journal Impact Factor.Web of Science 的引文中位数指标克服了期刊影响因子的主要局限。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022 Apr;42(4):367-371. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.317426. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models.综合研究者成就模型(CRAM):一种用于衡量研究者成就、影响和作用的框架,源自对相关指标和模型的系统文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e025320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025320.
6
Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact.利用出版指标突出学术产出和研究影响力。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1160-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.12482.
7
Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.学术出版物中的名誉作者泛滥?当前基于引文的评价指标的使用如何使每篇多作者文章中诚实的贡献者变成(伪)名誉作者。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-12. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100568. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.在 Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 中的土壤研究人员和期刊的引文和 h 指数。
PeerJ. 2013 Oct 22;1:e183. doi: 10.7717/peerj.183. eCollection 2013.
9
Performance Benchmarks for Scholarly Metrics Associated with Fisheries and Wildlife Faculty.与渔业和野生动物专业教师相关的学术指标的绩效基准
PLoS One. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0155097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155097. eCollection 2016.
10
Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants.分析国家学术麻醉研究所(NIAA)研究资助的分布和学术成果。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jun;73(6):679-691. doi: 10.1111/anae.14277. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving research on periodontal health of abutment teeth in removable partial dentures: A Scopus-based bibliometric analysis.可摘局部义齿基牙牙周健康的研究进展:基于Scopus的文献计量分析
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2025 Jan-Feb;29(1):6-13. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_437_24. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Insights from the top-cited papers in the critical care nursing literature: A bibliometric and visualized analysis.重症护理文献中被引用次数最多的论文的见解:文献计量学与可视化分析
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Sep;30(5):e13236. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13236. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
3
Quantity over quality of publications: Are we using the right metrics to judge author's productivity and impact in biomedical research?出版物数量优于质量:我们是否使用了正确的指标来衡量生物医学研究中作者的生产力和影响力?
J Postgrad Med. 2024 Jul 1;70(3):154-161. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_343_24. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
4
Online Visibility and Scientific Relevance of Strabismus Research: Bibliometric Analysis.斜视研究的在线可见性与科学相关性:文献计量分析
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Jun 12;13:e50698. doi: 10.2196/50698.
5
Journal metrics of the top-ranked Orthopaedic, Medical, and Surgical journals - A cross-sectional, comparative study.顶尖骨科、医学和外科期刊的期刊计量指标——一项横断面、比较研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Feb;48(2):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-06010-6. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Article-level metrics: A new approach to quantify reach and impact of published research.文章层面指标:一种量化已发表研究的传播范围和影响力的新方法。
J Orthop. 2023 May 4;40:83-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.05.001. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Big splashes & ripple effects: a narrative review of the short- & long-term impact of publications supported by an NIH CTSA pediatrics program.巨大轰动与涟漪效应:对美国国立卫生研究院临床与转化科学奖儿科项目所支持出版物的短期及长期影响的叙述性综述
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Mar;11(3):411-422. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-506.
8
Predicting citation impact from altmetric attention in clinical and translational research: Do big splashes lead to ripple effects?从临床和转化研究的关注度预测引用影响力:大轰动是否会引发涟漪效应?
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jun;15(6):1387-1392. doi: 10.1111/cts.13251. Epub 2022 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 中参考文献的差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;6(6):1291-1312. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12583. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia.游戏学术和他们的后果:作者身份、-索引和期刊影响因素如何塑造学术的未来。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Dec 4;286(1916):20192047. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2047.
3
Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database.新数据库中揭露了数百名极端自我引用的科学家。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7771):578-579. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7.
4
Alternative article-level metrics: The use of alternative metrics in research evaluation.替代文章计量指标:在研究评估中使用替代计量指标。
EMBO Rep. 2018 Dec;19(12). doi: 10.15252/embr.201847260. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Comparison of Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator and h-index for Neurosurgical and Spinal Surgical Journals.神经外科和脊柱外科期刊的影响因子、特征因子指标、SCImago期刊排名指标及h指数比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e328-e337. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.144. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
c-index and Subindices of the h-index: New Variants of the h-index to Account for Variations in Author Contribution.h指数的c指数及子指数:考虑作者贡献差异的h指数新变体
Cureus. 2018 May 15;10(5):e2629. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2629.
7
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability.著名科学期刊甚至难以达到平均可靠性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:37. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. eCollection 2018.
8
Charting the Publication and Citation Impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2016.绘制 NIH 临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划 2006 年至 2016 年的发表和引文影响图。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1162-1170. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002119.
9
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science.常用文献计量学在评估转化医学科研中的可行性
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):45-52. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.8. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
The Rise of Altmetrics.替代计量学的兴起
JAMA. 2017 Jan 10;317(2):131-132. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18346.

学者实用出版指标。

Practical publication metrics for academics.

机构信息

Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1705-1712. doi: 10.1111/cts.13067. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13067
PMID:33982433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504821/
Abstract

Research organizations are becoming more reliant on quantitative approaches to determine how to recruit and promote researchers, allocate funding, and evaluate the impact of prior allocations. Many of these quantitative metrics are based on research publications. Publication metrics are not only important for individual careers, but also affect the progress of science as a whole via their role in the funding award process. Understanding the origin and intended use of popular publication metrics can inform an evaluative strategy that balances the usefulness of publication metrics with the limitations of what they can convey about the productivity and quality of an author, a publication, or a journal. This paper serves as a brief introduction to citation networks like Google Scholar, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Microsoft Academic, and Dimensions. It also explains two of the most popular publication metrics: the h-index and the journal impact factor. The purpose of this paper is to provide practical information on using citation networks to generate publication metrics, and to discuss ideas for contextualizing and juxtaposing metrics, in order to help researchers in translational science and other disciplines document their impact in as favorable a light as may be justified.

摘要

研究机构越来越依赖定量方法来确定如何招募和提升研究人员、分配资金以及评估先前分配的影响。这些定量指标中的许多都是基于研究出版物。出版物指标不仅对个人职业发展很重要,而且通过在资金授予过程中发挥作用,影响整个科学的进展。了解流行出版物指标的来源和预期用途,可以为评估策略提供信息,在出版物指标的有用性与它们能够传达的关于作者、出版物或期刊的生产力和质量的局限性之间取得平衡。本文简要介绍了像谷歌学术、科睿唯安 Web of Science 核心合集、爱思唯尔 Scopus、微软学术和 Dimensions 这样的引文网络。它还解释了两个最流行的出版物指标:h 指数和期刊影响因子。本文的目的是提供使用引文网络生成出版物指标的实用信息,并讨论上下文化和并列化指标的想法,以帮助转化科学和其他学科的研究人员以尽可能合理的有利方式记录他们的影响。