Reply.
作者信息
Nishida Yoshihiro, Kano Kazuyuki, Nobuoka Yuji, Seo Takayuki
机构信息
Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Seikagaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
出版信息
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2148-2149. doi: 10.1002/art.41786. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;73(11):2148-2149. doi: 10.1002/art.41786. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Reply networks on a bulletin board system.公告板系统上的回复网络。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Mar;67(3 Pt 2):036117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.036117. Epub 2003 Mar 24.
3
Female reply strategies in a duetting Australian bushcricket, Caedicia sp. (Phaneropterinae: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera).澳大利亚一种二重唱灌丛蟋蟀Caedicia sp.（扇螽亚科：螽斯科：直翅目）中的雌性回应策略
J Exp Biol. 2004 Feb;207(Pt 5):803-11. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00840.
4
Training specialists to write appropriate reply letters to general practitioners about patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms; A cluster-randomized trial.培训专家就患有医学上无法解释的身体症状的患者向全科医生撰写恰当的回信；一项整群随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Reply letter utilization by secondary level specialists in a municipality in Brazil: a qualitative study.巴西某城市二级专家回复信的使用情况：一项定性研究
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Feb-Mar;21(2-3):96-110. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000200005.
6
Quality and general practitioner satisfaction with reply letters for dementia patients.痴呆症患者回信的质量与全科医生满意度
Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(3):165-70.
7
What is a low dose? Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Reply to the Response to "Reply to 'The RBE of low-LET radiations' " Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' Reply to "Comment on 'Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation' ".什么是低剂量？对《对〈低传能线密度辐射的相对生物效应〉的回复》的回复 对《对〈对〈低传能线密度辐射的相对生物效应〉的回复〉的回复》的回应 对《英国儿童白血病发病率中可能由天然本底电离辐射引起的比例的最新估计》的评论 对《对〈英国儿童白血病发病率中可能由天然本底电离辐射引起的比例的最新估计〉的评论》的回复
J Radiol Prot. 2010 Mar;30(1):93-101; author reply 99-101. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/1/L01. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
8
Emoji can facilitate recognition of conveyed indirect meaning.表情符号可以促进对所传达的间接意义的识别。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232361. eCollection 2020.
9
Improving clinical handover: Development of a web-based intensive care unit consultation system with structured reply generation.改善临床交接：开发一个具有结构化回复生成功能的基于网络的重症监护病房会诊系统。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Apr 29;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210292.w4180. eCollection 2016.
10
Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study.邮戳回复信封和通讯发送时间对邮件调查响应率的影响：前瞻性队列研究中的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 4;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001181. Print 2012.
本文引用的文献
1
The use and reporting of WOMAC in the assessment of the benefit of physical therapies for the pain of osteoarthritis of the knee: findings from a systematic review of clinical trials.WOMAC在评估物理治疗对膝骨关节炎疼痛疗效中的应用与报告：一项临床试验系统评价的结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug;51(8):1440-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes043. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
2
Outcome measures in placebo-controlled trials of osteoarthritis: responsiveness to treatment effects in the REPORT database.骨关节炎安慰剂对照试验的结局测量指标：REPORT 数据库中对治疗效果的反应性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 May;19(5):483-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
3
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010解释与详述：平行组随机试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
4
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009.骨关节炎研究学会（OARSI）髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎管理建议：第三部分：对 2009 年 1 月前发表的研究进行系统累积更新后的证据变化。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Apr;18(4):476-99. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
5
Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.解读慢性疼痛临床试验中组间差异的临床重要性：IMMPACT 建议。
Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.
Zotero 插件