School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Level 2, Connell Building, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4029, QLD, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6171-6174. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06220-x. Epub 2021 May 13.
Radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers often causes gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities such as diarrhoea. Evidence for the potential benefits of dietary interventions on the management of acute GI toxicities is inconclusive and of low quality, with no clear evidence-based guidelines to inform clinical practice. This study aims to provide an overview of current opinions and clinical practice of dietitians treating this cohort and to examine existing models of nutrition care in Australian cancer centres.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted over a video conferencing service to collect information relating to: demographic characteristics; referral protocol and post-treatment pathways; management strategies and interventions prescribed; and attitudes and confidence in service provided. Descriptive analysis was performed on quantitative data, and thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data.
In total, 17 dietitians across Australia participated in the study. Almost all centres (94%) had dietetics services available for this patient cohort; however, most did not have an automatic referral pathway (94%) or post-treatment pathway (88%). The opinions and prescription of dietary interventions for symptom management had multiple variations of a 'low' or 'modified-fibre' diet with differing ratios of soluble and insoluble fibre. Over half of the respondents believed that practice was not standardized within their workplace (58%) or Australia (82%).
There are variations in service provision with respect to opinions and prescription of dietary modifications within dietetic practice across Australia. The present study highlights the need to investigate the efficacy of dietary interventions on symptom management to better inform evidence-based models of care.
妇科癌症的放射治疗通常会引起胃肠道(GI)毒性,如腹泻。关于饮食干预对急性 GI 毒性管理的潜在益处的证据尚无定论,且质量较低,没有明确的循证指南来指导临床实践。本研究旨在概述治疗该队列的营养师的当前观点和临床实践,并检查澳大利亚癌症中心现有的营养护理模式。
通过视频会议服务进行半结构化访谈,收集与以下内容相关的信息:人口统计学特征;转诊方案和治疗后途径;管理策略和规定的干预措施;以及对提供的服务的态度和信心。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据进行主题分析。
澳大利亚共有 17 名营养师参与了这项研究。几乎所有中心(94%)都为该患者群体提供了饮食服务;然而,大多数中心没有自动转诊途径(94%)或治疗后途径(88%)。用于症状管理的饮食干预措施的意见和处方有多种“低纤维”或“改良纤维”饮食,其中可溶性纤维和不溶性纤维的比例不同。超过一半的受访者认为他们的工作场所(58%)或澳大利亚(82%)的实践没有标准化。
澳大利亚各地的饮食实践在饮食调整的意见和处方方面存在服务提供的差异。本研究强调需要研究饮食干预对症状管理的疗效,以更好地为基于证据的护理模式提供信息。