• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期心理治疗中联盟与症状严重程度的个体内动态关系:时间为何重要。

Intraindividual dynamics between alliance and symptom severity in long-term psychotherapy: Why time matters.

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2021 Jul;68(4):446-456. doi: 10.1037/cou0000545. Epub 2021 May 13.

DOI:10.1037/cou0000545
PMID:33983758
Abstract

The association between alliance and therapy outcome is one of the most investigated factors in psychotherapy research. However, even studies using advanced methods estimate effects over a specific time period (interval) between measurement occasions. Thus, it remains unknown how the magnitude and direction of effects depend on the considered time interval, resulting in limited comparability across studies. The current study examines the influence of time on the within-person relationship between alliance and symptom severity. Alliance (WAI-SR) and symptom severity (SCL-K11) were assessed every fifth session in = 650 patients receiving up to 100 weekly sessions (mode = 55; = 41.03; = 27.23) of individual psychotherapy in a German outpatient clinic. Bivariate continuous-time (CT) structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to estimate within-person cross- and auto-effects. Analysis revealed significant reciprocal within-person cross-effects with stronger relative effects of SCL-K11 on WAI-SR (₂₁) than vice versa (₁₂). CT analysis showed that both cross-lagged effects increased for longer time intervals with strongest effects for time intervals of about 40 sessions (₂₁ = -.47; ₁₂ = -.19). Alliance and symptom severity showed a reciprocal relationship. Expanding current evidence, our analysis showed how the magnitude of these effects depends on the considered time interval. Applying CT-SEM on longitudinal data of the alliance outcome association complements current cross-lagged panel analysis and allows to compare results of studies which are based on different time intervals between measurement occasions. Methodological, theoretical, and clinical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

联盟与治疗结果之间的关系是心理治疗研究中最受关注的因素之一。然而,即使是使用先进方法的研究,也只是估计在特定的时间间隔(区间)内的测量点之间的效果。因此,我们仍然不知道效应的大小和方向如何取决于所考虑的时间间隔,从而导致研究之间的可比性有限。本研究考察了时间对联盟与症状严重程度之间个体内关系的影响。在德国一家门诊诊所中,对 650 名接受多达 100 次每周个体心理治疗的患者,在每个治疗的第五次评估时,评估联盟(WAI-SR)和症状严重程度(SCL-K11)。使用双变量连续时间(CT)结构方程建模(SEM)来估计个体内交叉和自效应。分析显示,SCL-K11 对 WAI-SR 的相对影响更强(₂₁),而不是相反(₁₂),这表明存在显著的个体内交叉效应。CT 分析显示,两种交叉滞后效应随着时间间隔的增加而增加,在大约 40 次治疗的时间间隔内,效应最大(₂₁= -.47;₁₂= -.19)。联盟和症状严重程度之间存在相互关系。扩展当前的证据,我们的分析表明这些效应的大小如何取决于所考虑的时间间隔。在联盟结果关联的纵向数据上应用 CT-SEM 补充了当前的交叉滞后面板分析,并允许比较基于不同测量时间间隔的研究结果。讨论了方法学、理论和临床意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Intraindividual dynamics between alliance and symptom severity in long-term psychotherapy: Why time matters.长期心理治疗中联盟与症状严重程度的个体内动态关系:时间为何重要。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Jul;68(4):446-456. doi: 10.1037/cou0000545. Epub 2021 May 13.
2
Agency and alliance as change factors in psychotherapy.作为心理治疗变化因素的代理和联盟。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;89(3):214-226. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000628.
3
The interplay between agency and therapeutic bond in predicting symptom severity in long-term psychotherapy.在长期心理治疗中,机构间的相互作用和治疗关系对预测症状严重程度的影响。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jul;69(4):506-517. doi: 10.1037/cou0000602. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
Influence of patient and therapist agreement and disagreement about their alliance on symptom severity over the course of treatment: A response surface analysis.治疗过程中患者和治疗师对联盟的认同和不认同对症状严重程度的影响:响应面分析。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Apr;67(3):326-336. doi: 10.1037/cou0000398. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Working alliance predicts symptomatic improvement in public hospital-delivered psychotherapy in Nairobi, Kenya.工作联盟预测肯尼亚内罗毕公立医院提供的心理治疗在症状改善方面的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Jan;87(1):46-55. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000363. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
6
The within-client alliance-outcome relationship: A response surface analysis.患者层面的联盟-结果关系:响应面分析。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Nov;69(6):812-822. doi: 10.1037/cou0000630. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
7
The evolution of patients' concept of the alliance and its relation to outcome: A dynamic latent-class structural equation modeling approach.患者对联盟概念的演变及其与结果的关系:一种动态潜在类别结构方程建模方法。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):51-62. doi: 10.1037/cou0000555. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.联盟与早期治疗症状之间的互惠关系:两阶段个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Sep;88(9):829-843. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000594.
9
The alliance-outcome association in the treatment of adolescent depression.青少年抑郁症治疗中的联盟与治疗结果的关联。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2021 Mar;58(1):95-108. doi: 10.1037/pst0000366.
10
Separating the effects of improvements and deteriorations in mechanisms on outcome using the asymmetric effects model. 使用不对称效应模型分离机制改善和恶化对结果的影响。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Nov;68(6):696-704. doi: 10.1037/cou0000569. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of machine learning utilization within outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy research.门诊心理动力心理治疗研究中机器学习应用的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1055868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1055868. eCollection 2023.
2
The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders - an umbrella review based on updated criteria.心理动力心理治疗作为常见精神障碍的一种循证治疗方法的现状——基于更新标准的综合评价
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):286-304. doi: 10.1002/wps.21104.
3
Working alliance and adherence mediate the effect of guidance in a web-based program for participants with mild to moderate depressive symptoms: A secondary mediation analysis.
工作联盟与依从性在一个针对轻至中度抑郁症状参与者的网络项目中介导指导效果:一项中介效应分析。
Internet Interv. 2022 Nov 26;30:100593. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100593. eCollection 2022 Dec.