Suppr超能文献

脑卒中结局评估:优化龙氏量表、改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数的截断值。

Stroke outcome assessment: Optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251103. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The Longshi Scale, a visual-based scale, is reliable and valid in activity assessment, but lacks cutoff definition corresponding to classical scales such as the modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationships of the Longshi Scale with the modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index and optimize cutoff scores of these scales in stroke outcomes assessment. This is a cross-sectional study. Stroke patients were measured concurrently by the Longshi scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index. Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman correlation analysis were used to analyze the differences and associations among the three scales. The receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to determine the optimal cutoff scores. A total of 5475 stroke patients (67.3% ischemic) were included in this study. There are close relationships of the Longshi Scale with adjusted modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index (r = -0.861, 0.922; p<0.001, <0.001; respectively). The activity levels assessed by adjusted modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index among different Longshi scale grades were significantly different (χ2:4217.27, 4676.55; p<0.001, <0.001; respectively). The optimal cutoff scores were adjusted modified Rankin Scale 4, 3, 3, 3, 2 for Longshi scale grade 2 to 6 (sensitivity%: 96.12, 70.24, 89.10, 96.80, 86.23, specificity%: 72.72, 98.29, 93.81, 79.82, 92.89, respectively), and Barthel Index 15, 45, 60, 75, 80 for Longshi scale grade 2 to 6 (sensitivity%: 92.54, 89.28, 91.32, 90.30, 95.65, specificity%: 95.48, 89.51, 94.02, 90.41, 90.62, respectively). In conclusion, the classification of Longshi Scale is consistent with those of modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index. We recommend the Longshi Scale as an effective supplement for modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in assessing the outcome in acute stroke patients.

摘要

龙氏评估量表是一种基于视觉的量表,在活动评估中具有可靠性和有效性,但缺乏与改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数等经典量表相对应的截断定义。因此,本研究旨在探讨龙氏评估量表与改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数之间的关系,并优化这些量表在中风结局评估中的截断评分。这是一项横断面研究。中风患者同时接受龙氏量表、改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数评估。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Spearman 相关分析比较三种量表之间的差异和相关性。采用受试者工作特征曲线确定最佳截断评分。共纳入 5475 例中风患者(67.3%为缺血性中风)。龙氏评估量表与调整后的改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数具有密切关系(r = -0.861,0.922;p<0.001,<0.001;分别)。不同龙氏评估量表等级之间调整后的改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数评估的活动水平差异具有统计学意义(χ2:4217.27,4676.55;p<0.001,<0.001;分别)。最佳截断评分分别为改良 Rankin 量表 4、3、3、3、2 分,用于龙氏量表 2 级至 6 级(敏感度%:96.12、70.24、89.10、96.80、86.23,特异性%:72.72、98.29、93.81、79.82、92.89,分别),以及巴氏指数 15、45、60、75、80 分,用于龙氏量表 2 级至 6 级(敏感度%:92.54、89.28、91.32、90.30、95.65,特异性%:95.48、89.51、94.02、90.41、90.62,分别)。总之,龙氏量表的分类与改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数一致。我们建议将龙氏量表作为评估急性中风患者结局的改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数的有效补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b373/8118543/df1670fe65ee/pone.0251103.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验