• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of a nurse-led eHealth programme on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.护士主导的电子健康计划对脑卒中患者功能结局和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的汇总分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;12:1395270. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Nurse-led digital health program for home blood pressure monitoring in stroke patients: protocol for a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.护士主导的数字化家庭血压监测在脑卒中患者中的应用:一项基于随机对照试验的汇总分析方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 22;12:1378144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378144. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of Live Health Professional-Led Group eHealth Interventions for Adult Mental Health: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.生活健康专业人员主导的群组电子健康干预措施对成人心理健康的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e27939. doi: 10.2196/27939.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Effects of eHealth Interventions on Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康干预对心脏手术患者生活质量和心理结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 16;24(8):e40090. doi: 10.2196/40090.
7
Effectiveness of eHealth Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康戒烟干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e45111. doi: 10.2196/45111.
8
The Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Interventions for the Management of Patients With Multimorbidity: Protocol for a Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis.协作护理干预对多重疾病患者管理的有效性:系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 8;13:e58296. doi: 10.2196/58296.
9
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Moderate-to-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity Among Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康干预措施对心脏康复患者中中等至剧烈强度体力活动的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 29;25:e42845. doi: 10.2196/42845.
10
Promoting Self-management and Patient Activation Through eHealth: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.通过电子健康促进自我管理和患者激活:系统文献综述与荟萃分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 2;12:e38758. doi: 10.2196/38758.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of Nurse-Led Bundle Care in Preventing Post-Acute Complications and Enhancing Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.护士主导的综合护理对预防卒中患者急性后并发症及提高生活质量的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4310-S4313. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_989_24. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Nurse-led intervention in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases: a brief literature review.护士主导的心血管疾病患者管理干预措施:简要文献综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 2;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01422-6.
2
Nurse-led Telehealth Intervention for Rehabilitation (Telerehabilitation) Among Community-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.护士主导的远程康复(TeleRehabilitation)干预在慢性病社区患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 2;24(11):e40364. doi: 10.2196/40364.
3
eHealth in Care Coordination for Older Adults Living at Home: Scoping Review.居家老年照护中的电子健康:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 18;24(10):e39584. doi: 10.2196/39584.
4
The Impact of eHealth Interventions on the Improvement of Self-Care in Chronic Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.电子健康干预对慢性病患者自我护理改善的影响:系统评价综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;12(8):1253. doi: 10.3390/life12081253.
5
Adherence to the PRISMA-P 2015 reporting guideline was inadequate in systematic review protocols.系统评价方案对 PRISMA-P 2015 报告规范的遵循程度不足。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Stroke outcome assessment: Optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index.脑卒中结局评估:优化龙氏量表、改良 Rankin 量表和巴氏指数的截断值。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251103. eCollection 2021.
7
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
8
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Telerehabilitation services for stroke.中风的远程康复服务
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 31;1(1):CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3.
10
Telerehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中风幸存者的远程康复:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e10867. doi: 10.2196/10867.

护士主导的电子健康计划对脑卒中患者功能结局和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的汇总分析。

Effects of a nurse-led eHealth programme on functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with stroke: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Xinxiang, China.

Department of Anorectal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;12:1395270. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395270
PMID:38737865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11082325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide. Nurse-led eHealth programs have emerged as a potentially effective strategy to improve functional outcomes and quality of life in stroke survivors. However, the variability of study designs and outcomes measured across trials necessitates a pooled analysis to comprehensively assess the efficacy of these interventions. This protocol outlines the methodology for a pooled analysis that aims to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating nurse-led eHealth interventions for stroke patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This pooled analysis will be conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We will include RCTs that evaluate nurse-led eHealth programs and report on functional outcomes or quality of life in stroke patients. Comprehensive searches of electronic databases including Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO will be conducted with a predefined search strategy. Study selection will involve screening titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction will be undertaken independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias will be assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Additionally, the quality of evidence for each outcome will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses will be performed using random-effects models, and heterogeneity will be quantified using the I statistic. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis is poised to provide a nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of nurse-led eHealth programs in stroke rehabilitation, leveraging a thorough methodological framework and GRADE tool to ensure robustness and reliability of evidence. The investigation anticipates diverse improvements in patient outcomes, underscoring the potential of personalized, accessible eHealth interventions to enhance patient engagement and treatment adherence. Despite the challenges posed by the heterogeneity of interventions and rapid technological advancements, the findings stand to influence clinical pathways by integrating eHealth into standard care, if substantiated by the evidence. Our study's depth and methodological rigor possess the potential to initiate changes in healthcare policy, advocating for the adoption of eHealth and subsequent investigations into its cost-efficiency. Ultimately, we aim to contribute rich, evidence-based insights into the burgeoning field of digital health, offering a foundational assessment of its applications in stroke care. Our data is expected to have a lasting impact, not only guiding immediate clinical decisions but also shaping the trajectory of future healthcare strategies in stroke recovery.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Identifier (CRD42024520100: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=520100).

摘要

背景

中风仍然是全球致残的主要原因。以护士为主导的电子健康(eHealth)计划已成为改善中风幸存者功能结局和生活质量的潜在有效策略。然而,由于试验之间的研究设计和测量结果存在差异,因此需要进行汇总分析以全面评估这些干预措施的疗效。本方案概述了一项汇总分析的方法学,旨在综合评估评估护士主导的电子健康干预措施对中风患者的随机对照试验(RCT)的证据。

方法和分析

本汇总分析将按照 PRISMA 指南进行。我们将纳入评估护士主导的电子健康计划并报告中风患者功能结局或生活质量的 RCT。将通过预先确定的搜索策略对包括 Pubmed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 在内的电子数据库进行全面搜索。研究选择将包括筛选标题和摘要,然后使用明确的纳入和排除标准进行全文审查。数据提取将由两名评审员独立进行。通过 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。此外,还将使用 GRADE 方法评估每个结局的证据质量。将使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并使用 I 统计量量化异质性。亚组和敏感性分析将探索异质性的潜在来源。

讨论和结论

本汇总分析有望通过使用彻底的方法学框架和 GRADE 工具,提供对护士主导的电子健康计划在中风康复中的有效性的细致理解,确保证据的稳健性和可靠性。该研究预计会改善患者结局,突显个性化、可及的电子健康干预措施增强患者参与度和治疗依从性的潜力。尽管干预措施和快速技术进步的异质性带来了挑战,但如果证据确凿,这些发现有望通过将电子健康纳入标准护理来影响临床路径。我们研究的深度和方法学严谨性有可能改变医疗保健政策,倡导采用电子健康并随后对其成本效益进行调查。最终,我们旨在为数字健康领域提供丰富、基于证据的见解,为电子健康在中风护理中的应用提供基础评估。我们的数据预计将产生持久影响,不仅指导当前的临床决策,还塑造中风康复未来医疗保健策略的轨迹。

系统评价注册

标识符(CRD42024520100:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=520100)。