• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受前列腺癌影响的男性的综合多组分护理模式:澳大利亚 TrueNTH 的可行性研究。

An integrated multicomponent care model for men affected by prostate cancer: A feasibility study of TrueNTH Australia.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2021 Sep;30(9):1544-1554. doi: 10.1002/pon.5729. Epub 2021 May 24.

DOI:10.1002/pon.5729
PMID:33984175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8518483/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of implementing an integrated multicomponent survivorship care model for men affected by prostate cancer.

METHODS

Using a single arm prospective cohort study design, men with prostate cancer were recruited from two regional public hospitals in Australia for a 6-months program that provided information and decision support, exercise and nutrition management, specialised clinical support, and practical support through localised and central care coordination. Carers of the men were also invited to the program. Data were collected from multiple sources to evaluate: (1) recruitment capability and participant characteristics; (2) appropriateness and feasibility of delivering the specific intervention components using an electronic care management tool; and (3) suitability of data collection procedures and proposed outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of the 105 eligible men, 51 (consent rate 49%) participated in the program. Of the 31 carers nominated by the men, 13 consented (consent rate 42%). All carers and 50 (98%) men completed the program. Most (92%) men were newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer. All men attended initial screening and assessment for supportive care needs; a total of 838 episodes of contact/consultation were made by the intervention team either in person (9%) or remotely (91%). The intervention was implemented as proposed with no adverse events. The proposed outcome measures and evaluation procedures were found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the feasibility of implementing this integrated multicomponent care model for men affected by prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

评估为前列腺癌男性患者实施综合多组分生存护理模式的可行性。

方法

采用单臂前瞻性队列研究设计,从澳大利亚两家地区公立医院招募前列腺癌男性患者参加一项为期 6 个月的项目,该项目提供信息和决策支持、运动和营养管理、专门的临床支持以及通过局部和中央护理协调提供实际支持。也邀请了男性患者的照顾者参加该项目。从多个来源收集数据,以评估:(1)招募能力和参与者特征;(2)使用电子护理管理工具提供特定干预措施的适当性和可行性;(3)数据收集程序和拟议结果测量的适宜性。

结果

在 105 名符合条件的男性中,有 51 名(同意率 49%)参加了该项目。在男性提名的 31 名照顾者中,有 13 名(同意率 42%)同意参加。所有照顾者和 50 名(98%)男性都完成了该项目。大多数(92%)男性被诊断为局限性前列腺癌。所有男性都接受了初始筛查和支持性护理需求评估;干预团队共进行了 838 次接触/咨询,其中 9%是亲自进行的,91%是远程进行的。该干预措施按照建议实施,没有发生不良事件。拟议的结果测量和评估程序被认为是合适的。

结论

我们的结果支持为前列腺癌男性患者实施这种综合多组分护理模式的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d354/8518483/de8465a6d7be/PON-30-1544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d354/8518483/425ca107aea6/PON-30-1544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d354/8518483/de8465a6d7be/PON-30-1544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d354/8518483/425ca107aea6/PON-30-1544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d354/8518483/de8465a6d7be/PON-30-1544-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An integrated multicomponent care model for men affected by prostate cancer: A feasibility study of TrueNTH Australia.受前列腺癌影响的男性的综合多组分护理模式:澳大利亚 TrueNTH 的可行性研究。
Psychooncology. 2021 Sep;30(9):1544-1554. doi: 10.1002/pon.5729. Epub 2021 May 24.
2
Evaluating a multicomponent survivorship programme for men with prostate cancer in Australia: a single cohort study.评估澳大利亚前列腺癌男性多组分生存方案:单队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e049802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049802.
3
Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in rural Australia: A multi-methods, single-centre feasibility pilot.澳大利亚农村地区虚拟前列腺癌生存护理模式的可接受性:一项多方法、单中心可行性试点研究。
Aust J Rural Health. 2024 Aug;32(4):815-826. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13149. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
4
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remotely Delivered, Web-Based Behavioral Intervention for Men With Prostate Cancer: Four-Arm Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.基于网络的远程行为干预在前列腺癌男性患者中的可行性和可接受性:四臂随机对照先导试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 31;22(12):e19238. doi: 10.2196/19238.
5
Promoting integrated care in prostate cancer through online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment: a feasibility study in primary care.通过在线前列腺癌特定整体需求评估促进前列腺癌综合护理:初级保健中的可行性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1817-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04967-y. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Community pharmacy lifestyle intervention to increase physical activity and improve cardiovascular health of men with prostate cancer: a phase II feasibility study.社区药房生活方式干预以提高前列腺癌男性的体力活动和改善心血管健康:一项 II 期可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e025114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025114.
7
Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in regional Australia: A qualitative exploratory study.接受度调查:澳大利亚偏远地区前列腺癌生存者管理模型的定性探索性研究
Psychooncology. 2023 Apr;32(4):569-580. doi: 10.1002/pon.6101. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
8
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Behavioral Outcomes from a Technology-enhanced Behavioral Change Intervention (Prostate 8): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in Men with Prostate Cancer.一项基于技术增强的行为改变干预措施(前列腺癌 8 号)的可行性、可接受性和行为结果:一项针对前列腺癌男性的试点随机对照试验。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jun;75(6):950-958. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.040. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
Prostate cancer - evidence of exercise and nutrition trial (PrEvENT): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.前列腺癌——运动与营养试验证据(PrEvENT):一项随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 7;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1248-x.
10
Nurse-led group consultation intervention reduces depressive symptoms in men with localised prostate cancer: a cluster randomised controlled trial.护士主导的小组咨询干预可减轻局限性前列腺癌男性患者的抑郁症状:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 16;16:637. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2687-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of unmet supportive care needs reported by individuals ever diagnosed with cancer in Australia: a systematic review to support service prioritisation.澳大利亚曾被诊断患有癌症的个体报告的未满足的支持性护理需求的流行率:支持服务优先级排序的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 7;31(12):676. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08146-y.
2
Evaluating a multicomponent survivorship programme for men with prostate cancer in Australia: a single cohort study.评估澳大利亚前列腺癌男性多组分生存方案:单队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e049802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049802.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer survivorship essentials framework: guidelines for practitioners.前列腺癌生存者基本要素框架:从业者指南。
BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):18-29. doi: 10.1111/bju.15159. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Improving research for prostate cancer survivorship: A statement from the Survivorship Research in Prostate Cancer (SuRECaP) working group.提高前列腺癌生存者研究水平:前列腺癌生存者研究(SuRECaP)工作组的声明。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016.
2007年至2016年间前列腺癌患者及其伴侣效用值的系统评价与荟萃分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319852332. doi: 10.1177/2381468319852332. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
4
Follow-up care after treatment for prostate cancer: evaluation of a supported self-management and remote surveillance programme.前列腺癌治疗后的随访护理:支持性自我管理和远程监测方案的评估。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5561-0.
5
Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.长期前列腺癌幸存者的自我管理:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1326-1335. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01770. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
Interventions for prostate cancer survivorship: A systematic review of reviews.前列腺癌生存者干预措施:系统评价综述。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2339-2348. doi: 10.1002/pon.4888.
7
New Challenges in Psycho-Oncology Research III: A systematic review of psychological interventions for prostate cancer survivors and their partners: clinical and research implications.心理肿瘤学研究中的新挑战III:对前列腺癌幸存者及其伴侣的心理干预的系统评价:临床与研究意义
Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):873-913. doi: 10.1002/pon.4431.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗后的患者报告结局
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
USE OF PATIENT ASSESSED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE INSTRUMENTS IN PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2002-15.患者自评的健康相关生活质量工具在前列腺癌研究中的应用:2002 - 2015年文献的系统综述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(3):97-106. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000118. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: prevalence, medical treatments, and psychosocial interventions.根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍:患病率、医学治疗及心理社会干预措施
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2016 Mar;10(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000195.