University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2021 Jul-Aug;67:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
The impact of cardioneuroablation (CNA) on ventricular repolarization by using corrected QT interval (QTc) measurements has been recently demonstrated. The effects of cardiac pacing (CP) on ventricular repolarization have not been studied in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). We sought to compare ventricular repolarization effects of CNA (group 1) with CP (group 2) in patients with VVS.
We enrolled 69 patients with age 38 ± 13 years (53.6% male), n = 47 in group 1 and n = 22 in group 2. Clinical diagnosis of cardioinhibitory type was supported by cardiac monitoring or tilt testing. QTc was calculated at baseline (time-1), at 24 h after ablation (time-2), and at 9-12 months (time-3) in the follow-up.
In the group 1, from time-1 to time-2, a significant shortening in QTcFredericia (from 403 ± 27 to 382 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), QTcFramingham (from 402 ± 27 to 384 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), and QTcHodges (from 405 ± 26 to 388 ± 24 ms, p < 0.0001) was observed which remained lower than baseline in time-3 (373 ± 29, 376 ± 27, and 378 ± 27 ms, respectively). Although the difference between measurements in time-1 and time-2 was not statistically significant for QTcBazett, a significant shortening was detected between time-1 and time-3 (from 408 ± 30 to 394 ± 33, p = 0.005). In the group 2, there was no time-based changes on QTc measurements. In the linear mixed model analysis, the longitudinal reduction tendency in the QTcFredericia and QTcFramingham was more pronounced in group 1.
Our results demonstrate that CNA reduces QTc levels through neuromodulation effect whereas CP has no effect on ventricular repolarization in patients with VVS.
最近已经证明,心脏神经消融(CNA)对校正 QT 间期(QTc)测量的心室复极的影响。心脏起搏(CP)对血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)患者心室复极的影响尚未在研究中。我们旨在比较 CNA(第 1 组)和 CP(第 2 组)对 VVS 患者心室复极的影响。
我们纳入了 69 名年龄为 38 ± 13 岁(53.6%为男性)的患者,其中 47 名患者分在第 1 组,22 名患者分在第 2 组。心脏监测或倾斜试验支持心因性晕厥的临床诊断。在随访时,分别在基线(时间 1)、消融后 24 小时(时间 2)和 9-12 个月(时间 3)测量 QTc。
在第 1 组中,从时间 1 到时间 2,QTcFredericia(从 403 ± 27 到 382 ± 27 ms,p < 0.0001)、QTcFramingham(从 402 ± 27 到 384 ± 27 ms,p < 0.0001)和 QTcHodges(从 405 ± 26 到 388 ± 24 ms,p < 0.0001)均显著缩短,而在时间 3 时仍低于基线(分别为 373 ± 29、376 ± 27 和 378 ± 27 ms)。尽管 QTcBazett 测量在时间 1 和时间 2 之间的差异无统计学意义,但在时间 1 和时间 3 之间检测到显著缩短(从 408 ± 30 到 394 ± 33,p = 0.005)。在第 2 组中,QTc 测量没有时间依赖性变化。在线性混合模型分析中,第 1 组的 QTcFredericia 和 QTcFramingham 的纵向缩短趋势更为明显。
我们的结果表明,CNA 通过神经调节作用降低 QTc 水平,而 CP 对 VVS 患者的心室复极没有影响。