Ameyaw Edward Kwabena, Anjorin Seun, Ahinkorah Bright Opoku, Seidu Abdul-Aziz, Uthman Olalekan A, Keetile Mpho, Yaya Sanni
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Warwick Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 13;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01340-2.
Female genital mutilation is common in Sierra Leone. Evidence indicates that empowering women provides protective benefits against female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). Yet, the relationship between women's empowerment and their intention to cut their daughters has not been explored in Sierra Leone. The aim of this study was to assess the association between women's empowerment and their intention to have their daughters undergo FGM/C in the country.
Data for this study are from the 2013 Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey. A total of 7,706 women between the ages of 15 and 49 were included in the analysis. Analysis entailed generation of descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages), and estimation of multi-level logistic regression models to examine the association between women's empowerment, contextual factors and their intentions to cut their daughters.
A significantly higher proportion of women who participated in labour force reported that they intended to cut their daughters compared to those who did not (91.2%, CI = 90.4-91.9 and 86.0%, CI = 84.1-87.8, respectively). Similarly, the proportion intending to cut their daughters was significantly higher among women who accepted wife beating than among those who rejected the practice (94.9%, CI = 93.8-95.8 and 86.4% CI = 84.9-87.8, respectively). A significantly higher proportion of women with low decision-making power intended to cut their daughters compared to those with high decision-making power (91.0%, CI = 89.0-92.8 and 85.0% CI = 82.2-87.4, respectively). Results from multivariate regression analysis showed that the odds of intending to cut daughters were significantly higher among women who participated in labour force (aOR = 2.5, CI = 1.3-4.7) and those who accepted wife beating than among those who did not (aOR = 2.7, CI = 1.7-4.5). In contrast, the likelihood of intending to cut daughters was significantly lower among women with high than low knowledge (aOR = 0.4, CI = 0.3-0.7), and among those aged 45-49 than among those aged 15-19 (aOR = 0.2, CI = 0.0-0.6).
The findings underscore the need to align anti-FGM/C policies and programmes to women who have undergone FGM/C, those with low knowledge, women who support wife beating and young women. Such interventions could highlight the adverse implications of the practice by stressing the psychological, health and social implications of FGM/C on its survivors.
女性生殖器切割在塞拉利昂很常见。有证据表明,赋予妇女权力可为防止女性生殖器切割带来保护益处。然而,在塞拉利昂,妇女赋权与其切割女儿生殖器的意愿之间的关系尚未得到探讨。本研究的目的是评估该国妇女赋权与其让女儿接受女性生殖器切割的意愿之间的关联。
本研究的数据来自2013年塞拉利昂人口与健康调查。共有7706名年龄在15至49岁之间的妇女纳入分析。分析包括生成描述性统计数据(频率和百分比),以及估计多层次逻辑回归模型,以检验妇女赋权、背景因素与其切割女儿生殖器意愿之间的关联。
与未参加劳动力的妇女相比,参加劳动力的妇女中报告称打算切割女儿生殖器的比例显著更高(分别为91.2%,CI = 90.4 - 91.9和86.0%,CI = 84.1 - 87.8)。同样,接受丈夫殴打行为的妇女中打算切割女儿生殖器的比例显著高于拒绝这种行为的妇女(分别为94.9%,CI = 93.8 - 95.8和86.4%,CI = 84.9 - 87.8)。决策权力低的妇女中打算切割女儿生殖器的比例显著高于决策权力高的妇女(分别为91.0%,CI = 89.0 - 92.8和85.0%,CI = 82.2 - 87.4)。多变量回归分析结果显示,参加劳动力的妇女(调整后比值比 = 2.5,CI = 1.3 - 4.7)以及接受丈夫殴打行为的妇女中打算切割女儿生殖器的几率显著高于未参加劳动力和不接受丈夫殴打行为的妇女(调整后比值比 = 2.7,CI = 1.7 - 4.5)。相比之下,知识水平高的妇女中打算切割女儿生殖器的可能性显著低于知识水平低的妇女(调整后比值比 = 0.4,CI = 0.3 - 0.7),45 - 49岁的妇女中打算切割女儿生殖器的可能性显著低于15 - 19岁的妇女(调整后比值比 = 0.2,CI = 0.0 - 0.6)。
研究结果强调,有必要使反女性生殖器切割政策和方案与接受过女性生殖器切割的妇女、知识水平低的妇女、支持丈夫殴打行为的妇女以及年轻妇女保持一致。此类干预措施可通过强调女性生殖器切割对幸存者的心理、健康和社会影响,突出这种做法的不利影响。