• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康教育在预防女性生殖器切割(FGM/C)中的干预效果:系统评价。

Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

School of Social policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 12;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x
PMID:29650025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5897952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful practice that violates the human rights of women and girls. Despite global efforts to restrict the practice, there have been few reports on major positive changes to the problem. Health education interventions have been successful in preventing various health conditions and promoting service use. They have also been regarded as promising interventions for preventing FGM/C. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesise findings of studies about effectiveness of health education as an intervention to prevent FGM/C.

METHODS

The electronic databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Psych INFO, CINAHL and ASSIA. Our search included papers published in the English language without date limits. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A predesigned data recording form was used to extract data from the included studies which were summarised by comparing similar themes.

RESULTS

Twelve out of 359 individual studies met our inclusion criteria. Seven studies were quantitative, three were qualitative and two used mixed methods. Six studies tested before and after the interventions, four studies assessed the effectiveness of previous interventions used by different research teams and two studies endorsed the intervention. Four main factors emerged and were associated with facilitating or hindering the effectiveness of health education interventions: sociodemographic factors; socioeconomic factors; traditions and beliefs; and intervention strategy, structure and delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

It is vital to target factors associated with facilitating or hindering the effectiveness of health education for FGM/C. This increases the possibility of effective, collective change in behaviour and attitude which leads to the sustainable prevention of FGM/C and ultimately the improved reproductive health and well-being of individuals and communities.

摘要

背景

女性外阴残割/切割(FGM/C)是一种危害妇女和女童人权的有害做法。尽管全球努力限制这种做法,但很少有关于该问题的重大积极变化的报告。健康教育干预措施已成功预防了各种健康状况并促进了服务的使用。它们也被认为是预防 FGM/C 的有前途的干预措施。本系统评价的目的是综合研究关于健康教育作为预防 FGM/C 的干预措施的有效性的发现。

方法

搜索的电子数据库包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Psych INFO、CINAHL 和 ASSIA。我们的搜索包括没有时间限制的以英语发表的论文。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估研究质量。使用预先设计的数据记录表格从纳入的研究中提取数据,通过比较相似的主题对数据进行总结。

结果

在 359 项单独研究中,有 12 项符合我们的纳入标准。其中 7 项是定量研究,3 项是定性研究,2 项使用混合方法。6 项研究测试了干预前后,4 项研究评估了不同研究团队使用的先前干预措施的有效性,2 项研究认可了干预措施。出现了四个主要因素,这些因素与促进或阻碍健康教育干预措施的有效性有关:社会人口因素;社会经济因素;传统和信仰;以及干预策略、结构和实施。

结论

针对与促进或阻碍 FGM/C 健康教育有效性相关的因素至关重要。这增加了有效、集体改变行为和态度的可能性,从而实现 FGM/C 的可持续预防,并最终改善个人和社区的生殖健康和福祉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c53/5897952/3c3f680e6094/12978_2018_503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c53/5897952/3c3f680e6094/12978_2018_503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c53/5897952/3c3f680e6094/12978_2018_503_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review.健康教育在预防女性生殖器切割(FGM/C)中的干预效果:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 12;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0503-x.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Female genital mutilation and cutting in the Arab League and diaspora: A systematic review of preventive interventions.阿拉伯联盟及其侨民中的女性生殖器切割和割礼:预防干预措施的系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 May;27(5):468-478. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13749. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
4
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
5
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
"I just wanted to be like everyone else…": Qualitative exploration of women's perspectives on female genital mutilation/cutting and its potential abandonment in Somalia.“我只是想和其他人一样……”:对索马里女性关于女性生殖器切割及其可能摒弃该习俗的观点的定性探索
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;5(7):e0004571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004571. eCollection 2025.
2
What do we know about nursing practice in relation to functional ability limitations, frailty and models of care among older people in home- and facility-based care: a scoping review.关于家庭和机构照护中老年人的功能能力受限、衰弱及照护模式方面,我们对护理实践了解多少:一项范围综述。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 10;24(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02948-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.我们对评估医学生和医疗专业人员关于女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和实践了解多少?一项系统综述。
Reprod Health. 2017 May 22;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0318-1.
2
Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: a review of international human rights norms and standards.针对女性生殖器切割的性别平等与人权方法:国际人权规范与标准综述
Reprod Health. 2017 May 12;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0322-5.
3
Injured bodies, damaged lives: experiences and narratives of Kenyan women with obstetric fistula and Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.
Prevalence and determinants of female genital mutilation: current insights from ten at-risk countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.
女性生殖器切割的流行情况及决定因素:撒哈拉以南非洲十个高危国家的当前见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22279-1.
4
Forbidden, yet common: Female genital cutting among the Oromo in central Ethiopia.被禁止却又常见:埃塞俄比亚中部奥罗莫族中的女性生殖器切割习俗
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 17;19(12):e0315566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315566. eCollection 2024.
5
Effectiveness of health education intervention on intention not to perform female genital mutilation/cutting in the future among key decision-makers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.健康教育干预对关键决策者未来不实施女性生殖器切割/切割意图的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03427-y.
6
'It is what was handed over to us as our heritage and must not be taken away just like that': Traditional birth attendants' attitudes towards the elimination of intergenerational female genital mutilation/cutting in Osun State, Nigeria.“这是传承给我们的遗产,绝不能就这样被剥夺”:尼日利亚奥孙州传统助产士对消除女性生殖器切割习俗的态度。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 20;4(5):e0001585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001585. eCollection 2024.
7
Six aspects of female genital mutilation education (SAFE) model: findings from a qualitative study.女性生殖器切割教育(SAFE)模式的六个方面:定性研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 9;14(5):e077838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077838.
8
The Fight against Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among the Ejaghams of Cameroon: Kinks in the Legal Approach and Implications for Public Health Practice.喀麦隆埃贾姆族中反对女性生殖器切割的斗争:法律途径中的问题及其对公共卫生实践的影响
Int J Sex Health. 2021 Jul 23;34(1):160-168. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1955075. eCollection 2022.
9
Contextual determinants of generational continuation of female genital mutilation among women of reproductive age in nigeria: analysis of the 2018 demographic and health survey.尼日利亚育龄妇女中女性生殖器切割世代延续的背景决定因素:2018 年人口与健康调查分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Mar 26;21(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01778-1.
10
Do Attitude, Awareness and Intention to Perform Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting for Their Daughters of Women Healthcare Providers Differ from Mothers in Somalia?索马里女性医疗保健提供者对其女儿实施女性外阴残割或切割的态度、意识和意愿与母亲们有差异吗?
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Aug 11;15:1333-1343. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S411217. eCollection 2023.
受伤的身体,受损的生活:肯尼亚患有产科瘘和女性生殖器切割/环切的妇女的经历与叙述
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 14;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0300-y.
4
Supportive supervision for volunteers to deliver reproductive health education: a cluster randomized trial.对志愿者开展生殖健康教育的支持性监督:一项整群随机试验
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 3;13(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0244-7.
5
Key points for abolishing Female Genital Mutilation from the perspective of the men involved.从男性参与者角度看废除女性生殖器切割的关键点。
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012.美国的女性生殖器切割:2012年面临风险的妇女和女童最新估计数
Public Health Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):340-7. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100218.
7
A Mixed-Methods Study of Immigrant Somali Women's Health Literacy and Perinatal Experiences in Maine.一项关于缅因州索马里移民妇女健康素养与围产期经历的混合方法研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;60(5):593-603. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12332.
8
Subjective Reality: The Influence of Perceived and Objective Conversational Valence on Binge Drinking Determinants.主观现实:感知到的和客观的对话效价对酗酒决定因素的影响。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(7):859-66. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018570. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
FGM: the mutilation of girls and young women must stop.女性生殖器切割:对女童和年轻女性的残害必须停止。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):483-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60176-3.
10
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting.女性生殖器切割产科后果的最新系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:542859. doi: 10.1155/2014/542859. Epub 2014 Nov 23.