Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2021 Sep;34(9):1795-1805. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00815-9. Epub 2021 May 13.
Allograft survival of deceased donor kidneys with suboptimal histology (DRTx/suboptimal histology: >10% glomerulosclerosis, >10% tubulointerstitial scarring, or >mild vascular sclerosis) is inferior to both DRTx with optimal histology (DRTx/optimal histology) and living donor kidneys irrespective of histologic changes (LRTx). In this report, we explored the reasons behind this guarded outcome with a special focus on the role of alloimmunity. We initially assessed gene expression in 39 time-zero allograft biopsies using the Nanostring 770 genes PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Subsequently, we studied 696 consecutive adult kidney allograft recipients that were grouped according to allograft type and histology at time-zero biopsy [DRTx/suboptimal histology (n = 194), DRTx/optimal histology (n = 166), and LRTx (n = 336)]. Part-1: Several immune pathways were upregulated in time-zero biopsies from DRTx/suboptimal histology (n = 11) compared to LRTx (n = 17) but not to DRTx/optimal histology (n = 11). Part-2: Amongst the three groups of recipients, DRTx/suboptimal histology had the highest incidence of acute rejection episodes, most of which occurred during the first year after transplantation (early rejection). This increase was mainly attributed to T cell mediated rejection, while the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection was similar amongst the three groups. Importantly, early acute T cell mediated rejection was a strong independent predictor for allograft failure in DRTx/suboptimal histology (adjusted HR: 2.13, P = 0.005) but not in DRTx/optimal histology nor in LRTx. Our data highlight an increased baseline immunogenicity in DRTx/suboptimal histology compared to LRTx but not to DRTx/optimal histology. However, our results suggest that donor chronic histologic changes in DRTx may help transfer such increased baseline immunogenicity into clinically relevant acute rejection episodes that have detrimental effects on allograft survival. These findings may provide a rationale for enhanced immunosuppression in recipients of DRTx with baseline chronic histologic changes to minimize subsequent acute rejection and to prolong allograft survival.
与最佳组织学的 DRTx(DRTx/optimal histology)和活体供肾相比,组织学不佳的供体肾(DRTx/suboptimal histology:>10%肾小球硬化、>10%肾小管间质瘢痕形成或轻度血管硬化)的移植物存活率较差。在本报告中,我们特别关注同种异体免疫的作用,探讨了这种保守结果的原因。我们最初使用 Nanostring 770 基因 PanCancer Immune Profiling 面板评估了 39 个零时移植物活检的基因表达。随后,我们研究了根据零时活检的移植物类型和组织学分为三组的 696 例连续成年肾移植受者[DRTx/suboptimal histology(n=194)、DRTx/optimal histology(n=166)和 LRTx(n=336)]。第 1 部分:与 LRTx(n=17)相比,DRTx/suboptimal histology(n=11)的零时活检中有几个免疫途径上调,但与 DRTx/optimal histology(n=11)相比则没有。第 2 部分:在三组受者中,DRTx/suboptimal histology 的急性排斥反应发生率最高,其中大多数发生在移植后第一年(早期排斥反应)。这种增加主要归因于 T 细胞介导的排斥反应,而三组的抗体介导排斥反应发生率相似。重要的是,早期急性 T 细胞介导的排斥反应是 DRTx/suboptimal histology 移植物衰竭的一个独立的强预测因素(调整后的 HR:2.13,P=0.005),但在 DRTx/optimal histology 和 LRTx 中则不然。我们的数据强调了与 LRTx 相比,DRTx/suboptimal histology 中的基线免疫原性增加,但与 DRTx/optimal histology 相比则没有。然而,我们的结果表明,DRTx 中的供体慢性组织学变化可能会将这种增加的基线免疫原性转化为临床上相关的急性排斥反应,从而对移植物存活率产生不利影响。这些发现可能为 DRTx 受者提供增强免疫抑制的依据,以最小化随后的急性排斥反应并延长移植物存活时间。