Delaforce Alana, Duff Jed, Munday Judy, Farmer Shannon, Miller Kristin, Glover Lynne, Corney Christopher, Hurst Cameron, Ansell Gareth, Gutta Naadir, Tuffaha Haitham, Hardy Janet
School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 May 6;14:1037-1044. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S313309. eCollection 2021.
Blood transfusions are a risk factor for increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Patient blood management guidelines provide guidance to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes. They outline steps to help prevent transfusions and considerations for when deciding to transfuse. One recommendation to prevent unnecessary transfusion is to optimize patients using Pre-operative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P). The uptake of these recommendations is highly variable, and an effective approach to implementing them in a tailored and context-specific manner remains elusive.
A mixed-methods, interventional study, using a type two-hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, will evaluate the impact of a change package to improve the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. The change package consists of the intervention (PAIDSEM-P) supported by theoretically informed implementation strategies. Pre- and post-implementation, retrospective health record reviews will determine the effect of the change package on provider outcomes, including compliance with guideline recommendations as measured by the proportion of patients who have the appropriate tests performed, and, if required, appropriate treatment and/or referrals. Patient outcomes will be measured by checking for any difference in the proportion of patients with anemia on the day of surgery and the proportion of patients who receive a blood transfusion during the peri-operative period. An economic evaluation will be conducted to compare health outcomes and costs. The feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of the PAIDSEM-P will be assessed using a quantitative, validated survey to measure implementation outcomes.
Testing of implementation theory is required to advance understanding of what works, in what context, and the impact on implementation success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a theoretically informed change package on improving the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. If successful, it will also provide a framework for health care facilities to follow when addressing other evidence-practice gaps.
输血是导致发病率、死亡率上升及住院时间延长的一个风险因素。患者血液管理指南为降低风险和改善患者预后提供指导。这些指南概述了有助于预防输血的步骤以及决定输血时的考量因素。一项预防不必要输血的建议是使用术前贫血和缺铁筛查、评估及管理路径(PAIDSEM-P)来优化患者。这些建议的采纳情况差异很大,以量身定制且因地制宜的方式有效实施这些建议的方法仍然难以捉摸。
一项采用混合方法的干预性研究,使用二型混合有效性-实施设计,将评估一套变革方案对提高PAIDSEM-P采纳率的影响。该变革方案由理论支持的实施策略所支持的干预措施(PAIDSEM-P)组成。在实施前后,通过回顾性健康记录审查来确定变革方案对医疗服务提供者结局的影响,包括通过进行适当检查的患者比例来衡量的对指南建议的依从性,以及在需要时进行适当治疗和/或转诊的情况。患者结局将通过检查手术当天贫血患者比例以及围手术期接受输血的患者比例的差异来衡量。将进行经济评估以比较健康结局和成本。将使用经过验证的定量调查来评估PAIDSEM-P的可行性、可接受性和适宜性,以衡量实施结果。
需要对实施理论进行检验,以加深对何种措施有效、在何种背景下有效以及对实施成功的影响的理解。本研究旨在评估一套基于理论的变革方案对提高PAIDSEM-P采纳率的影响。如果成功,它还将为医疗机构在解决其他证据与实践差距时提供一个遵循的框架。