Delaforce Alana, Duff Jed, Munday Judy, Hardy Janet
School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 1;13:1759-1770. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S282308. eCollection 2020.
Patients undergoing major surgery risk significant blood loss and transfusion, which increases substantially if they have pre-existing anemia. Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P) outline recommended blood tests and treatment to optimize patients before surgery. Documented success using PAIDSEM-P to reduce transfusions and improve patient outcomes exists, but the reporting quality of such studies is suboptimal. It remains unclear what implementation strategies best support the implementation of PAIDSEM-P.
Maximum variation, purposive sampling was used to recruit a total of 15 participants, including a range of health professionals and patients for semi-structured interviews. Data analysis utilized a deductive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for barrier identification and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for reporting recommended implementation strategies. A modified version of the Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time (AACTT) framework assisted with conceptualisation and targeted strategy selection.
The analysis revealed five barriers: access to knowledge and information, patient needs and resources, knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, available resources, and networks and communications, which had strong ERIC recommendations, including conduct educational meetings, develop educational materials, distribute educational materials, obtain and use patients/consumers family feedback, involve patients/consumers/family members, conduct a local needs assessment, access new funding, promote network weaving, and organize clinician implementation team meetings.
Mapping the barriers and strategies using the ERIC framework on the basis of individual actor categories proved to be useful in identifying a pragmatic number of implementation strategies that may help in supporting the utilisation of the PAIDSEM-P and other evidence-based healthcare implementation problems more broadly.
接受大手术的患者面临大量失血和输血的风险,如果他们术前就存在贫血,这种风险会大幅增加。术前贫血与缺铁筛查、评估及管理路径(PAIDSEM-P)概述了推荐的血液检查和治疗方法,以在手术前优化患者状况。有文献记载使用PAIDSEM-P在减少输血和改善患者预后方面取得了成功,但此类研究的报告质量并不理想。目前尚不清楚哪种实施策略能最有效地支持PAIDSEM-P的实施。
采用最大差异目的抽样法,共招募了15名参与者,包括一系列卫生专业人员和患者,进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用演绎法,依据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来识别障碍,并依据实施变革专家建议(ERIC)来报告推荐的实施策略。行动、行动者、背景、目标和时间(AACTT)框架的修改版有助于概念化和针对性策略选择。
分析揭示了五个障碍:获取知识和信息、患者需求与资源、对干预措施的知识和信念、可用资源以及网络与沟通,这些障碍有很强的ERIC建议,包括召开教育会议、编写教育材料、分发教育材料、获取并利用患者/消费者家庭反馈、让患者/消费者/家庭成员参与、进行当地需求评估、获取新资金、促进网络编织以及组织临床医生实施团队会议。
基于个体行动者类别,使用ERIC框架来梳理障碍和策略,被证明有助于确定切实可行的一系列实施策略,这些策略可能有助于更广泛地支持PAIDSEM-P的应用以及其他基于证据的医疗保健实施问题。