Wang Xing, Luo Jinni, Liu Chuan, Liu Yanna, Wu Xiaoying, Zheng Fengping, Wen Zhuofu, Tian Hong, Wei Xiuqing, Guo Yunwei, Li Jianzhong, Chen Xiaoliang, Tao Jin, Qi Xiaolong, Wu Bin
Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Province Engineering and Technology Research Center of Digestive Endoscopy, Guangzhou, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):540. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3401.
Endoscopic therapy has been widely applied to prevent variceal rebleeding, but data addressing the effect of endoscopic variceal eradication (VE) are lacking. We aimed to clarify the clinical impact of VE and reveal the long-term incidence and mortality of gastrointestinal rebleeding.
This prospective study included 228 cirrhotic patients who underwent secondary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding and achieved VE through a systematic procedure we proposed as endoscopic sequential therapy (EST). Rebleeding rates before and after VE were compared and cumulative incidence of rebleeding and mortality were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A logistic regression model and P for trend were used to investigate the optimal time limit for VE.
During a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 33.0 (23.0-48.75) months, rebleeding was identified in 28 patients (12.3%) after VE and in 27 patients (11.8%) during endoscopic sessions. The cumulative incidence of rebleeding before and after VE was 8.4% and 1.8% at 6 months, and 14.9% and 4.0% at 1 year respectively (P<0.001). The long-term incidence of all-cause/variceal rebleeding following VE was 10.4%/9.1%, and 31.5%/23.5% at 2 and 5 years respectively. Eleven patients (4.8%) died and the 5-year mortality was 9.3%. VE achieved within 6 months was associated with fewer rebleeding events compared to VE achieved after 6 months (5.5% . 20.0%, P=0.002), while logistic regression revealed an overall increasing trend in the odds ratio of rebleeding ( patients with VE time ≤6 months) for patients with 6< VE time ≤12 months and VE time >12 months (P for trend <0.001).
VE further reduces rebleeding based on routine endoscopic prophylaxis and improves long-term prognosis. VE within 6 months seems to be the optimal timing and should therefore be advocated.
内镜治疗已广泛应用于预防静脉曲张再出血,但关于内镜下静脉曲张根除术(VE)效果的数据尚缺乏。我们旨在阐明VE的临床影响,并揭示胃肠道再出血的长期发生率和死亡率。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了228例接受静脉曲张出血二级预防并通过我们提出的作为内镜序贯治疗(EST)的系统程序实现VE的肝硬化患者。比较VE前后的再出血率,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算再出血和死亡率的累积发生率。使用逻辑回归模型和趋势P值来研究VE的最佳时间限制。
在中位(四分位间距)随访期33.0(23.0 - 48.75)个月期间,VE后28例患者(12.3%)出现再出血,内镜检查期间27例患者(11.8%)出现再出血。VE前后6个月时再出血的累积发生率分别为8.4%和1.8%,1年时分别为14.9%和4.0%(P<0.001)。VE后全因/静脉曲张再出血的长期发生率在2年和5年时分别为10.4%/9.1%和31.5%/23.5%。11例患者(4.8%)死亡,5年死亡率为9.3%。与6个月后实现的VE相比,6个月内实现的VE与更少的再出血事件相关(分别为5.5%和20.0%,P = 0.002),而逻辑回归显示,对于6 < VE时间≤12个月和VE时间> 12个月的患者,再出血优势比总体呈上升趋势(趋势P值<0.001)。
基于常规内镜预防,VE进一步降低再出血并改善长期预后。6个月内进行VE似乎是最佳时机,因此应予以提倡。