Surgical Unit "M. Rubino" Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Aldo Moro of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Unit of Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Aldo Moro of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;25(8):935-940. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02459-y. Epub 2021 May 13.
Anal fissure (AF) is a common, painful disease that strongly affects patients' quality of life, however, no scoring system to assess the severity of AF is available in the literature. The aim of this study was to set up and validate a reliable scoring system to quantify the severity of AF, to be used in prospective trials comparing the efficacy and the outcomes of surgical or medical treatments.
The study was conducted on patients with acute or chronic AF and a control group in a tertiary centre for coloproctology in June 2020-September 2020. Two researchers independently carried out a structured interviewer-led questionnaire at two different time points (T1/T2). The questionnaire consisted of five items selected according to the most commonly reported symptoms for AF: the item pain, was scored from 0 to 10 using a visual analogue scale, and quality of life, duration of pain, use of painkillers, and bleeding were scored from 1 to 5 using Likert-scale questions. The scoRing systEm for AnaL fIsSurE (REALISE) score was the sum of the points. Patients with AF and a control group of patients with haemorrhoids, anal fistula, or obstructed defecation syndrome entered the study. Main outcome measures were reliability, inter-/intraobserver agreement, and repeatability.
One hundred and fifty well-matched patients (75 with AF and 75 controls) were enrolled. A significant difference was found between the mean REALISE score for patients with AF and controls (p < 0.001). The two REALISE scores were highly correlated (r = 0.99). The coefficient of repeatability was 1.45 in T1 and 1.18 in T2.
The REALISE score may have an important role in the assessment and management of AF, in grading the severity of AF and comparing results of different treatments.
肛裂(AF)是一种常见的、痛苦的疾病,强烈影响患者的生活质量,但目前文献中尚无评估 AF 严重程度的评分系统。本研究旨在建立和验证一种可靠的评分系统,以量化 AF 的严重程度,用于比较手术或药物治疗效果和结果的前瞻性试验。
该研究于 2020 年 6 月至 9 月在一家肛肠病学三级中心对急性或慢性 AF 患者和对照组患者进行。两名研究人员在两个不同时间点(T1/T2)独立进行了结构化访谈员主导的问卷调查。问卷由根据 AF 最常见报告症状选择的五个项目组成:疼痛项目,使用视觉模拟量表从 0 到 10 分进行评分,生活质量、疼痛持续时间、止痛药使用和出血使用 Likert 量表问题从 1 到 5 分进行评分。评分系统为 Anal fissure(REALISE)评分,为各项目得分总和。肛裂患者和对照组患者为痔、肛瘘或出口梗阻性便秘患者。主要观察指标为可靠性、观察者间/内一致性和可重复性。
共纳入 150 名匹配良好的患者(75 名 AF 患者和 75 名对照组患者)。AF 患者和对照组患者的 REALISE 评分平均值存在显著差异(p<0.001)。两个 REALISE 评分高度相关(r=0.99)。T1 的可重复性系数为 1.45,T2 为 1.18。
REALISE 评分在 AF 的评估和管理、AF 严重程度分级以及比较不同治疗结果方面可能具有重要作用。