Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Estate, Roslin, UK.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2021 Jul;62(4):413-420. doi: 10.1111/vru.12978. Epub 2021 May 14.
The performance of cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems compared to conventional helical multidetector CT (MDCT) imaging of the equine head is unknown. The aim of this prospective, method-comparison study was to compare the ability of CBCT and MDCT to detect abnormalities in equine cadaver heads. Eleven equine cadaver heads were scanned using a CBCT scanner and a 64-slice MDCT scanner. Consensus evaluations for CBCT and MDCT scans were performed by three observers. Identified abnormalities were grouped into subcategories with a focus on dental abnormalities. Kappa agreement values between detected abnormalities for CBCT and MDCT methods were calculated. Of 468 teeth evaluated, 122 (26.1%) were found to have abnormalities (including in 58 infundibula and 7 pulps) using MDCT and 105 (22.4%) were found to have abnormalities (including in 52 infundibula and 2 pulps) using CBCT. The agreement between CBCT and MDCT was almost perfect for overall detection of dental abnormalities (k = 0.90) with k = 1 for diastema k = 0.95 for clinical crown abnormalities, and k = 0.93 for infundibular abnormalities. However, the detection of pulp changes by CBCT was only moderate k = 0.44. Increased scatter radiation, non-calibrated Hounsfield Unit and artefacts in CBCT images made accurate identification of the pulp density difficult. In conclusion, CBCT results were similar to conventional MDCT for the majority of dental abnormalities, however, pulp abnormalities were not reliably identified using CBCT, potentially limiting its clinical use for detecting endodontic disease in its current form. Further comparison with more cases with confirmed dental disease and studies in clinical cases are warranted.
锥形束 CT(CBCT)系统与传统的螺旋多排 CT(MDCT)对头马成像的性能比较尚不清楚。本前瞻性方法比较研究的目的是比较 CBCT 和 MDCT 对头马尸体头部检测异常的能力。使用 CBCT 扫描仪和 64 排 MDCT 扫描仪对头马 11 具尸体头部进行扫描。由 3 位观察者对 CBCT 和 MDCT 扫描进行共识评估。将确定的异常分为亚类,重点关注牙齿异常。计算 CBCT 和 MDCT 方法检测到的异常之间的 Kappa 一致性值。在评估的 468 颗牙齿中,MDCT 发现 122 颗(26.1%)存在异常(包括 58 个漏斗和 7 个牙髓),CBCT 发现 105 颗(22.4%)存在异常(包括 52 个漏斗和 2 个牙髓)。CBCT 和 MDCT 在总体检测牙齿异常方面的一致性几乎是完美的(k=0.90),牙间隙的 k 值为 1,临床冠异常的 k 值为 0.95,漏斗异常的 k 值为 0.93。然而,CBCT 对牙髓变化的检测仅为中度(k=0.44)。CBCT 图像中散射辐射增加、未校准的亨氏单位和伪影使得准确识别牙髓密度变得困难。总之,CBCT 结果与大多数牙齿异常的常规 MDCT 相似,然而,CBCT 无法可靠地识别牙髓异常,这可能限制了其在当前形式下用于检测牙髓疾病的临床应用。需要进一步与更多有确诊牙病的病例进行比较,并在临床病例中进行研究。