Suppr超能文献

锥形束 CT 和多排 CT 线性口内测量的准确性:两种 CT 的故事。

Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.

机构信息

Clinic for Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(8):637-44. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/21152480. Epub 2012 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare the accuracy of linear bone measurements of cone beam CT (CBCT) with multidetector CT (MDCT) and validate intraoral soft-tissue measurements in CBCT.

METHODS

Comparable views of CBCT and MDCT were obtained from eight intact cadaveric heads. The anatomical positions of the gingival margin and the buccal alveolar bone ridge were determined. Image measurements (CBCT/MDCT) were performed upon multiplanar reformatted data sets and compared with the anatomical measurements; the number of non-assessable sites (NASs) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Radiological measurements were accurate with a mean difference from anatomical measurements of 0.14 mm (CBCT) and 0.23 mm (MDCT). These differences were statistically not significant, but the limits of agreement for bone measurements were broader in MDCT (-1.35 mm; 1.82 mm) than in CBCT (-0.93 mm; 1.21 mm). The limits of agreement for soft-tissue measurements in CBCT were smaller (-0.77 mm; 1.07 mm), indicating a slightly higher accuracy. More NASs occurred in MDCT (14.5%) than in CBCT (8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT is slightly more reliable for linear measurements than MDCT and less affected by metal artefacts. CBCT accuracy of linear intraoral soft-tissue measurements is similar to the accuracy of bone measurements.

摘要

目的

比较锥形束 CT(CBCT)与多排 CT(MDCT)的线性骨测量精度,并验证 CBCT 中口腔软组织的测量值。

方法

从 8 个完整的尸体头颅中获得 CBCT 和 MDCT 的可比视图。确定牙龈缘和颊牙槽骨嵴的解剖位置。对多平面重建数据集进行图像测量(CBCT/MDCT),并与解剖测量值进行比较;评估无法评估的部位数量(NAS)。

结果

放射学测量值准确,与解剖测量值的平均差异为 0.14mm(CBCT)和 0.23mm(MDCT)。这些差异在统计学上无显著性意义,但骨测量的一致性界限在 MDCT 中更宽(-1.35mm;1.82mm),而在 CBCT 中较窄(-0.93mm;1.21mm)。CBCT 中软组织测量的一致性界限较小(-0.77mm;1.07mm),表明准确性略高。MDCT 中出现的无法评估部位数量(14.5%)多于 CBCT(8.3%)。

结论

与 MDCT 相比,CBCT 更可靠用于线性测量,且受金属伪影的影响较小。CBCT 对口腔内线性软组织测量的准确性与骨测量的准确性相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Metal artifact reduction in dental CT images using polar mathematical morphology.采用极坐标数学形态学降低牙科 CT 图像中的金属伪影。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Apr;102(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.009. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
4
Histomorphometric comparison after fixation with formaldehyde or glyoxal.甲醛或乙二醛固定后的组织形态计量学比较。
Biotech Histochem. 2011 Oct;86(5):359-65. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2010.520275. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验