Suppr超能文献

针灸与物理治疗对膝骨关节炎患者的影响:一项随机对照研究。

The Effect of Acupuncture and Physiotherapy on Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Atalay Sevgi Gümüs, Durmus Aysen, Gezginaslan Ömer

机构信息

Ankara City Hospital, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):E269-E278.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent form of joint disease, and the most common location is the knee.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of acupuncture treatment and physiotherapy on pain, physical function, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

SETTINGS

The research took place in the interventional pain unit of a tertiary center in a university hospital.

METHODS

One hundred patients with KOA were randomly divided into the acupuncture group and the physiotherapy group. Both treatments were given in 12 sessions over 6 weeks. Thirteen acupuncture points were selected for the knee. Local points were GB34, SP10, SP9, ST36, ST35, ST34, EX-LE2, EX-LE5, EXLE4, and distal (distant) points were defined as KI3, SP6, LI4, and ST41. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used to determine functional status and health-related QOL, respectively. All patients were evaluated at baseline, after the last treatment, and at the 12-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the acupuncture group and physiotherapy group in terms of pain, total WOMAC, and SF-36 levels at baseline, after treatment, and at the 12th week after treatment (P > 0.05). Both treatments significantly improved functional status (acupuncture, from 63.8 ± 20.81 to 53.72 ± 19.43; and physiotherapy, from 59.04 ± 21.49 to 52.28 ± 19.54; P < 0.05) and decreased the level of pain assessed by VAS (acupuncture, from 8.32 ± 1.61 to 5.54 ± 2.34; and physiotherapy, from 7.86 ± 1.9 to 5.68 ± 2.42; P < 0.05) at the 12-week follow-up of the study. There was no adverse advent related to therapeutic methods.

LIMITATIONS

Sham or placebo control groups are lacking in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The acupuncture and physiotherapy performed twice weekly for 6 weeks have similar effects with regard to pain, functional status, and QOL. There were no significant differences between the acupuncture and physiotherapy groups in relief of pain, improved functional status, and QOL in the treatment of KOA. Both acupuncture and physiotherapy treatments were found to yield significantly superior results when compared with baseline values.

摘要

背景

骨关节炎是最常见的关节疾病形式,最常累及的部位是膝关节。

目的

本研究旨在确定针灸治疗和物理治疗对膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者疼痛、身体功能和生活质量(QOL)的影响。

研究设计

本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。

研究地点

研究在一所大学医院三级中心的介入疼痛科进行。

方法

100例KOA患者被随机分为针灸组和物理治疗组。两种治疗均在6周内进行12次。为膝关节选择了13个穴位。局部穴位为胆经34、脾经10、脾经9、胃经36、胃经35、胃经34、经外奇穴膝眼2、经外奇穴膝眼5、经外奇穴膝眼4,远端(远部)穴位为肾经3、脾经6、大肠经4、胃经41。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量疼痛强度。分别采用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和36项简短健康调查(SF - 36)来确定功能状态和与健康相关的生活质量。所有患者在基线、最后一次治疗后以及12周随访期进行评估。

结果

在基线、治疗后以及治疗后第12周,针灸组和物理治疗组在疼痛、WOMAC总分和SF - 36水平方面无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。在研究的12周随访时,两种治疗均显著改善了功能状态(针灸组,从63.8±20.81改善至53.72±19.43;物理治疗组,从59.04±21.49改善至52.28±19.54;P<0.05),并降低了VAS评估的疼痛水平(针灸组,从8.32±1.61降至5.54±2.34;物理治疗组,从7.86±1.9降至5.68±2.42;P<0.05)。未发现与治疗方法相关的不良事件。

局限性

本研究缺乏假手术或安慰剂对照组。

结论

每周进行两次、为期6周的针灸和物理治疗在疼痛、功能状态和生活质量方面具有相似的效果。在KOA治疗中,针灸组和物理治疗组在缓解疼痛、改善功能状态和生活质量方面无显著差异。与基线值相比,针灸和物理治疗均取得了显著更好的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验