University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Honolulu, HI (WH).
J Addict Med. 2021;15(4):283-284. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000849.
In this issue, authors Abhishek Jain and colleagues report the outcome of a survey of the physician membership of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, bearing on attitudes toward the use of civil commitment in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs). This comment considers the sources of the pejorative view in which civil commitment for SUD is often held, identifying several historical analogies with other illnesses. Resolution of the common confusion between toxidrome and addiction, with a renewed emphasis on the treatability of SUDs, may contribute to more productive treatment matching and outcomes.
在本期中,作者 Abhishek Jain 和同事报告了一项对美国成瘾医学学会医师会员的调查结果,该调查涉及他们对在物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中使用民事强制治疗的态度。这篇评论考虑了人们对 SUD 的民事强制治疗持有负面看法的根源,发现了与其他疾病的几个历史类比。解决毒瘾和成瘾之间的常见混淆,并重新强调 SUD 的可治疗性,可能有助于更有效地进行治疗匹配和改善治疗效果。