• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循环脑啡肽酶假说:沙库巴曲缬沙坦为射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者带来新机遇?

Circulating neprilysin hypothesis: A new opportunity for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?

机构信息

Heart Failure Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0249674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249674. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249674
PMID:33989294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8121351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Circulating Neprilysin (sNEP) has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF). In PARAGON-HF benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was only observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤57%. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of sNEP in outpatients with HF and LVEF >57%, in comparison with patients with LVEF ≤57%.

METHODS

Consecutive HF outpatients were included from May-2006 to February-2016. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization and the main secondary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. For the later competing risk methods were used.

RESULTS

sNEP was measured in 1428 patients (age 67.7±12.7, 70.3% men, LVEF 35.8% ±14), 144 of which had a LVEF >57%. sNEP levels did not significantly differ between LVEF groups (p = 0.31). During a mean follow-up of 6±3.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 979 patients and the secondary composite endpoint in 714 (in 111 and 84 of the 144 patients with LVEF >57%, respectively). sNEP was significantly associated with both composite endpoints. Age- and sex- adjusted Cox regression analyses showed higher hazard ratios for sNEP in patients with LVEF >57%, both for the primary (HR 1.37 [1.16-1.61] vs. 1.04 [0.97-1.11]) and the secondary (HR 1.38 [1.21-1.55] vs. 1.11 [1.04-1.18]) composite endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

sNEP prognostic value in patients with HF and LVEF >57% outperforms that observed in patients with lower LVEF. Precision medicine using sNEP may identify HF patients with preserved LVEF that may benefit from treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.

摘要

背景

循环脑啡肽酶(sNEP)已成为心力衰竭(HF)的潜在预后生物标志物。在 PARAGON-HF 研究中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的获益仅见于左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤57%的患者。我们旨在评估 sNEP 在 LVEF>57%的 HF 门诊患者中的预后价值,并与 LVEF≤57%的患者进行比较。

方法

连续纳入 2006 年 5 月至 2016 年 2 月期间的 HF 门诊患者。主要终点是全因死亡或 HF 住院的复合终点,主要次要终点是心血管死亡或 HF 住院的复合终点。对于后者,采用竞争风险方法。

结果

共纳入 1428 例患者(年龄 67.7±12.7 岁,70.3%为男性,LVEF 为 35.8%±14%),其中 144 例 LVEF>57%。两组间 sNEP 水平无显著差异(p=0.31)。中位随访 6±3.9 年后,共有 979 例患者发生主要终点事件,714 例患者发生次要复合终点事件(144 例 LVEF>57%的患者中分别有 111 例和 84 例)。sNEP 与两个复合终点均显著相关。年龄和性别校正的 Cox 回归分析显示,在 LVEF>57%的患者中,sNEP 的风险比更高,在主要终点(HR 1.37[1.16-1.61] vs. 1.04[0.97-1.11])和次要终点(HR 1.38[1.21-1.55] vs. 1.11[1.04-1.18])中均如此。

结论

sNEP 在 LVEF>57%的 HF 患者中的预后价值优于 LVEF 较低患者。使用 sNEP 的精准医学可能会识别出保留 LVEF 的 HF 患者,这些患者可能从沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗中获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/8121351/f7a501592472/pone.0249674.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/8121351/eb2c768d7d75/pone.0249674.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/8121351/f7a501592472/pone.0249674.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/8121351/eb2c768d7d75/pone.0249674.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a95a/8121351/f7a501592472/pone.0249674.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Circulating neprilysin hypothesis: A new opportunity for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?循环脑啡肽酶假说:沙库巴曲缬沙坦为射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者带来新机遇?
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0249674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249674. eCollection 2021.
2
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.射血分数对沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的疗效及预后的影响:ARNI与ACEI对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744.
3
Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心力衰竭射血分数谱中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044586. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
4
Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭:PARAGLIDE-HF 和 PARAGON-HF 的预先指定的参与者水平汇总分析。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Aug 14;44(31):2982-2993. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad344.
5
Circulating Neprilysin in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的循环中性肽链内切酶
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
6
Cardiac and Noncardiac Disease Burden and Treatment Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan: Insights From a Combined PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF Analysis.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心脏和非心脏疾病负担及治疗效果的影响:来自PARAGON-HF和PARADIGM-HF联合分析的见解
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Mar;14(3):e008052. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008052. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
Hemodynamic Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure in the EVALUATE-HF Study: Effect Modification by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Sex.在评估心力衰竭(EVALUATE-HF)研究中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利对心力衰竭患者的血流动力学影响:左心室射血分数和性别的效应修正
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Mar;14(3):e007891. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007891. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
Serum uric acid, influence of sacubitril-valsartan, and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PARAGON-HF.血清尿酸、沙库巴曲缬沙坦的影响与射血分数保留的心力衰竭的心血管结局:PARAGON-HF。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;22(11):2093-2101. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1984. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
A putative placebo analysis of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure across the full range of ejection fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在整个射血分数范围内对心力衰竭影响的一项假定安慰剂分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 1;41(25):2356-2362. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa184.
10
Pulse Pressure, Prognosis, and Influence of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.脉压、预后以及沙库巴曲缬沙坦对射血分数保留心力衰竭的影响。
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):546-556. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16277. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的生物标志物
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Jun 23;8:e20. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.37. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心力衰竭射血分数谱中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044586. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
2
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂在射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
3
Circulating Neprilysin in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的循环中性肽链内切酶
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Soluble Neprilysin in the General Population: Clinical Determinants and Its Relationship to Cardiovascular Disease.人群中可溶性 Neprilysin 的临床决定因素及其与心血管疾病的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012943. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Serum Neprilysin and Recurrent Admissions in Patients With Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者血清 Neprilysin 与再入院的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 18;6(8):e005712. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005712.
6
Effect of Natriuretic Peptide-Guided Therapy on Hospitalization or Cardiovascular Mortality in High-Risk Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.利钠肽指导治疗对射血分数降低的高危心力衰竭患者住院率或心血管死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Aug 22;318(8):713-720. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.10565.
7
A Test in Context: Neprilysin: Function, Inhibition, and Biomarker.在背景下的检验:脑啡肽酶:功能、抑制和生物标志物。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):639-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.060.
8
Serum neprilysin and recurrent hospitalizations after acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭后血清中性肽链内切酶与再次住院情况
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:742-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.271. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Neprilysin: Indications, Expectations, and Challenges.中性内肽酶:适应症、期望与挑战。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Jul;69(7):647-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
10
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗工作组编写,欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20.