Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;22(11):2093-2101. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1984. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of serum uric acid (SUA) on outcomes in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and whether sacubitril-valsartan reduces SUA and use of SUA-related therapies.
We analysed 4795 participants from the Prospective Comparison of ARNI [angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor] with ARB [angiotensin-receptor blockers] Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF) trial. We related baseline hyperuricaemia (using age and gender adjusted assay definitions) to the primary outcome [cardiovascular (CV) death and total HF hospitalizations]. We assessed the associations between changes in SUA and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS) and other cardiac biomarkers from baseline to 4 months. We simultaneously adjusted for baseline and time-updated SUA to determine whether lowering SUA was associated with clinical benefit. The mean (± standard deviation) age of patients was 73 ± 8 years and 52% were women. After multivariable adjustment, hyperuricaemia was associated with increased risk for the primary outcome [rate ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.90]. The treatment effect of sacubitril-valsartan for the primary endpoint was not significantly modified by hyperuricaemia (P-value for interaction = 0.14). Sacubitril-valsartan reduced SUA by 0.38 mg/dL (95% CI 0.31-0.45) compared with valsartan at 4 months, with greater effect in those with elevated SUA vs. normal SUA (-0.51 mg/dL vs. -0.32 mg/dL) (P-value for interaction = 0.031). Sacubitril-valsartan reduced the odds of initiating SUA-related treatments by 32% during follow-up (P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, change in SUA was inversely associated with change in KCCQ-OSS and directly associated with high-sensitivity troponin T (P < 0.05). Time-updated SUA was a stronger predictor of adverse outcomes than baseline SUA.
Serum uric acid independently predicted adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Sacubitril-valsartan reduced SUA and the initiation of related therapy compared with valsartan. Reductions in SUA were associated with improved outcomes.
本研究旨在确定血清尿酸(SUA)对射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者结局的预后价值,以及沙库巴曲缬沙坦是否降低 SUA 和使用与 SUA 相关的治疗方法。
我们分析了来自前瞻性比较 ARNI(血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂)与 ARB(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)对射血分数保留的心力衰竭全球结局(PARAGON-HF)试验的 4795 名参与者的数据。我们将基线高尿酸血症(使用年龄和性别调整的检测定义)与主要结局(心血管死亡和总心力衰竭住院)相关联。我们评估了 SUA 和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷整体综合评分(KCCQ-OSS)从基线到 4 个月之间的变化之间的关联,以及其他心脏生物标志物。我们同时调整基线和时间更新的 SUA,以确定降低 SUA 是否与临床获益相关。患者的平均年龄(±标准差)为 73±8 岁,52%为女性。经过多变量调整后,高尿酸血症与主要结局的风险增加相关[比值比 1.61,95%置信区间(CI)1.37-1.90]。沙库巴曲缬沙坦对主要终点的治疗效果并未因高尿酸血症而显著改变(交互作用 P 值=0.14)。与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在 4 个月时降低了 0.38mg/dL(95%CI 0.31-0.45)的 SUA,在尿酸升高的患者中效果更大(-0.51mg/dL 比-0.32mg/dL)(交互作用 P 值=0.031)。在随访期间,沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了 32%开始使用与 SUA 相关治疗的可能性(P<0.001)。经过多变量调整后,SUA 的变化与 KCCQ-OSS 的变化呈负相关,与高敏肌钙蛋白 T 呈正相关(P<0.05)。时间更新的 SUA 是不良结局的预测因素,比基线 SUA 更强。
血清尿酸独立预测 HFpEF 的不良结局。与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了 SUA 和相关治疗的起始。SUA 的降低与结局的改善相关。