Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO.
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.028. Epub 2021 May 11.
Dangling protocols are known to vary by surgeon and center, and their specific regimen is often largely based on single surgeon or institutional experience. A systematic review was conducted to derive evidence-based recommendations for dangling protocols according to patient-specific and flap-specific considerations.
A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase-OVID and Cochrane-CENTRAL. Study design, patient and flap characteristics, protocol details, dangling-related complications, and flap success rate were recorded. Studies were graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Scale. Data heterogeneity precluded quantitative analysis.
Eleven articles were included (level of evidence (range):IIb-IV; N (range):8-150; age (range):6-89). Dangling initiation, time, and frequency varied considerably. Flap success rate ranged from 94 to 100%. Active smoking, diabetes, and hypertension are associated with characteristic physiologic changes that require vigilance and potential protocol modification. Early dangling appears to be safe across a variety of free flap locations, sizes, and indications. Axial fasciocutaneous flaps may tolerate more aggressive protocols than muscular flaps. While flaps with single venous anastomosis tolerate dangling, double venous or flow-through anastomoses may provide additional benefit. Major limitations included small sample sizes, uncontrolled study designs, and heterogeneous patient selection, dangling practices, monitoring methods, and outcome measures.
Significant heterogeneity persists in postoperative dangling protocols after lower extremity microvascular reconstruction. Patient comorbidities and flap characteristics appear to affect tolerance to dangling. We propose two different standardized pathways based on risk factors. Clinical vigilance should be exercised in tailoring lower extremity protocols to patients' individual characteristics and postoperative course.
悬空协议因外科医生和中心而异,其具体方案通常主要基于单个外科医生或机构的经验。进行了系统评价,以根据患者特定和皮瓣特定的考虑因素得出基于证据的悬空协议建议。
使用 PubMed、Embase-OVID 和 Cochrane-CENTRAL 进行了系统评价。记录了研究设计、患者和皮瓣特征、方案细节、悬空相关并发症和皮瓣成功率。使用牛津循证医学中心证据等级量表对研究进行分级。数据异质性排除了定量分析。
共纳入 11 篇文章(证据水平(范围):IIb-IV;N(范围):8-150;年龄(范围):6-89)。悬空的开始、时间和频率差异很大。皮瓣成功率从 94%到 100%不等。吸烟、糖尿病和高血压与需要警惕和潜在方案修改的特征性生理变化有关。早期悬空似乎在各种游离皮瓣位置、大小和适应证中都是安全的。轴型筋膜皮瓣比肌肉皮瓣更能耐受更激进的方案。虽然带有单一静脉吻合的皮瓣可以耐受悬空,但双静脉或血流通过吻合可能提供额外的益处。主要局限性包括样本量小、对照研究设计以及混杂的患者选择、悬空实践、监测方法和结果测量。
下肢微血管重建后,术后悬空方案仍存在显著异质性。患者合并症和皮瓣特征似乎影响悬空的耐受性。我们根据危险因素提出了两种不同的标准化方案。在根据患者的个体特征和术后过程定制下肢方案时,应保持临床警惕。