F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Device and Packaging Development, PTD Biologics Europe (PTDE-D), Basel, Switzerland; and.
SG Lab Analytics, Nuova Ompi, Stevanato Group, Padova, Italy.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2021 Nov-Dec;75(6):474-489. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012567. Epub 2021 May 14.
In the past decades, the silicone layer thickness and its distribution on the inner glass barrels of prefilled syringes have been characterized in several studies. However, the limited number of adequate methods to characterize thin baked-on silicone layers and the destructive nature of some analytical techniques suggest challenges to the inter-lab reproducibility of some methods. In this study, the measured silicone layer thickness of baked-on siliconized syringes was compared between two laboratories, both equipped with white light reflectometry coupled to laser interferometry instrumentation (Bouncer, LE UT 1.0, LE UT 2.0). The quantity of silicone oil of a subset of those syringes was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Glide force tests were realized as complementary measurements on both syringes analyzed by white light reflectometry coupled to laser interferometry instrumentation and on non-analyzed identical syringes from the same lot. Silicone profiles of all prefilled syringes including the limit of detection results replaced with 20 nm were comparable, but values were slightly lower when measured with the Bouncer instrument. An increase of the layer thickness from the finger flange to the needle side was found for all syringes with all instruments (20 nm to 130-140 nm). Glide force results were similar except for a difference in peak width in the break loose region between the laboratories. The mean quantities of silicone oil found by both laboratories were similar (64 µg/syringe and 69 µg/syringe). Overall, comparable results between laboratories suggest a good reproducibility of the thickness measurement method as a result of thorough method understanding and defining key method parameters. Hence this study presents a robust inter-lab comparison between silicone layer thickness measurements that has been a lack in the literature up to now.
在过去的几十年中,已经有几项研究对预装注射器的内玻璃筒的硅酮层厚度及其分布进行了描述。然而,由于能够对薄的烤硅层进行特征描述的方法数量有限,以及某些分析技术的破坏性,这提示一些方法的实验室间重现性存在挑战。在这项研究中,对两个实验室之间的烤硅化注射器的硅酮层厚度进行了比较,这两个实验室都配备了白光反射计和激光干涉计(Bouncer,LE UT 1.0,LE UT 2.0)。这些注射器中的一部分硅油的数量是通过傅里叶变换红外光谱法测量的。滑动力测试作为对通过白光反射计和激光干涉计进行分析的注射器以及来自同一批次的相同注射器的补充测量而实现。所有预装注射器的硅酮轮廓(包括以 20nm 替换的检测限结果)都具有可比性,但使用 Bouncer 仪器测量时,值略低。所有注射器的从指缘到针侧的层厚度都有增加(20nm 至 130-140nm)。所有仪器都发现了从指缘到针侧的层厚度增加(20nm 至 130-140nm)。除了两个实验室之间的松开区域的峰宽差异外,滑动力结果相似。两个实验室发现的硅油平均数量相似(64µg/注射器和 69µg/注射器)。总体而言,实验室之间的可比结果表明,由于对方法的全面理解和定义关键方法参数,厚度测量方法具有良好的重现性。因此,本研究提供了迄今为止文献中缺乏的硅酮层厚度测量的稳健实验室间比较。