Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):713-721. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102705. Epub 2021 May 14.
When combined with adductor canal block (ACB), local anesthetic infiltration between popliteal artery and capsule of knee (iPACK) is purported to improve pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the analgesic benefits of adding iPACK to ACB in the setting of surgeon-administered periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) are unclear.
To evaluate the analgesic benefits of adding iPACK to ACB, compared with ACB alone, in the setting of LIA following TKA.
We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effects of adding iPACK block to ACB versus ACB alone on pain severity at 6 hours postoperatively in adult patients undergoing TKA. We a priori planned to stratify analysis for use of LIA. Opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, and iPACK-related complications were secondary outcomes.
Fourteen trials (1044 patients) were analyzed. For the primary outcome comparison in the of LIA (four trials, 273 patients), adding iPACK to ACB did not improve postoperative pain at 6 hours. However, in the of LIA (eight trials, 631 patients), adding iPACK to ACB reduced pain by a weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% CI) of -1.33 cm (-1.57 to -1.09) (p<0.00001). For the secondary outcome comparisons in the of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB did not improve postoperative pain at all other time points, opioid consumption or functional recovery. In contrast, in the of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB reduced pain at 12 hours, and 24 hours by a WMD (95% CI) of -0.98 (-1.79 to -0.17) (p0.02) and -0.69 (-1.18 to -0.20) (p=0.006), respectively, when compared with ACB alone, but did not reduce opioid consumption. Functional recovery was also improved by a log(odds ratio) (95% CI) of 1.28 (0.45 to 2.11) (p=0.003). No iPACK-related complications were reported.
Adding iPACK to ACB in the setting of periarticular LIA does not improve analgesic outcomes following TKA. In the absence of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB reduces pain up to 24 hours and enhances functional recovery. Our findings do not support the addition of iPACK to ACB when LIA is routinely administered.
当与隐动脉阻滞(ACB)联合使用时,膝关节囊和腘动脉之间的局部麻醉浸润(iPACK)据称可改善全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的疼痛。然而,在关节周围局部浸润镇痛(LIA)下添加 iPACK 以增强 ACB 的镇痛效果尚不清楚。
评估在 LIA 下添加 iPACK 以增强 ACB 与单独使用 ACB 相比在 TKA 后的镇痛效果。
我们对比较在 TKA 后添加 iPACK 块与单独使用 ACB 对接受 LIA 的成人患者术后 6 小时疼痛严重程度影响的随机试验进行了荟萃分析。我们预先计划对使用 LIA 进行分层分析。术后 24 小时的阿片类药物消耗、功能恢复和 iPACK 相关并发症为次要结局。
分析了 14 项试验(1044 名患者)。对于 LIA 组(四项试验,273 名患者)的主要结局比较,添加 iPACK 并不能改善术后 6 小时的疼痛。然而,在 LIA 组(八项试验,631 名患者)中,添加 iPACK 可减轻疼痛,加权均数差值(WMD)(95%CI)为-1.33cm(-1.57 至-1.09)(p<0.00001)。对于 LIA 组的次要结局比较,添加 iPACK 并不能改善其他所有时间点的术后疼痛、阿片类药物消耗或功能恢复。相比之下,在 LIA 组中,添加 iPACK 可减轻术后 12 小时和 24 小时的疼痛,WMD(95%CI)分别为-0.98(-1.79 至-0.17)(p=0.02)和-0.69(-1.18 至-0.20)(p=0.006),与单独使用 ACB 相比,而不会减少阿片类药物的消耗。功能恢复也得到了改善,优势比(95%CI)为 1.28(0.45 至 2.11)(p=0.003)。未报告与 iPACK 相关的并发症。
在关节周围 LIA 中添加 iPACK 并不能改善 TKA 后的镇痛效果。在没有 LIA 的情况下,添加 iPACK 可减轻疼痛,持续时间长达 24 小时,并增强功能恢复。我们的研究结果不支持在常规使用 LIA 时添加 iPACK 以增强 ACB。