• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续收肌管阻滞联合隐神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。

The analgesic effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with popliteal plexus block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Central Hospital of Baoding, Northern Greatwall Street 320#, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.

Department of Dermatology, The Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Ground Force 82nd Group Army, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79487-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-79487-9
PMID:39533094
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11557969/
Abstract

This study aimed to confirm the hypothesis that continuous ACB (CACB) combined with a popliteal plexus block (PPB) can improve posterior knee pain, reduce nalbuphine consumption, and shorten the length of hospital stay. Patients who underwent TKA were allocated to the CACB + sham block (SHAM) or CACB + PPB groups. The primary outcome was the maximum pain score originating from the posterior knee within 4 h after TKA. Secondary outcomes included the maximum pain score originating from the posterior and anterior knees within 72 h after TKA, range of motion on postoperative day (POD) 1-3, postoperative nalbuphine consumption within 72 h of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications. The maximum pain score of the posterior knee was lower in the CACB + PPB group than in the CACB + SHAM group within 0-12 h after surgery. Nalbuphine consumption within 24 h after surgery was lower in the CACB + PPB group than in the CACB + SHAM group. The range of motion was better in the CACB + PPB group than in the CACB + SHAM group on POD1 and 2. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the CACB + PPB group than in the CACB + SHAM group. The incidence of clinical significant nausea and vomiting was lower in the CACB + PPB group than in the CACB + SHAM group. This study found that PPB combined with CACB could relieve pain in the posterior knee within at least 12 h after TKA, reduce nalbuphine consumption within 24 h after TKA, improve the range of motion on POD1 and 2, and shorten the length of hospital stay for patients who underwent TKA.

摘要

本研究旨在验证以下假说,即连续腘窝神经阻滞(ACB)联合隐神经髌下支阻滞(PPB)可减轻 TKA 后膝关节后方疼痛,减少纳布啡用量,缩短住院时间。将接受 TKA 的患者分为连续 ACB+假阻滞(SHAM)或连续 ACB+PPB 组。主要结局是 TKA 后 4 小时内来自膝关节后方的最大疼痛评分。次要结局包括 TKA 后 72 小时内来自膝关节后方和前方的最大疼痛评分、术后第 1-3 天的关节活动度、术后 72 小时内纳布啡的用量、住院时间和并发症。术后 0-12 小时内,连续 ACB+PPB 组的膝关节后方最大疼痛评分低于连续 ACB+SHAM 组。术后 24 小时内,连续 ACB+PPB 组纳布啡用量低于连续 ACB+SHAM 组。术后第 1 天和第 2 天,连续 ACB+PPB 组的关节活动度优于连续 ACB+SHAM 组。连续 ACB+PPB 组的住院时间短于连续 ACB+SHAM 组。连续 ACB+PPB 组的临床显著恶心和呕吐发生率低于连续 ACB+SHAM 组。本研究发现,PPB 联合 ACB 可减轻 TKA 后至少 12 小时内膝关节后方疼痛,减少 TKA 后 24 小时内纳布啡用量,改善术后第 1 天和第 2 天的关节活动度,缩短 TKA 患者的住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a493/11557969/718c90e905c5/41598_2024_79487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a493/11557969/fe1a80db9f1f/41598_2024_79487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a493/11557969/718c90e905c5/41598_2024_79487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a493/11557969/fe1a80db9f1f/41598_2024_79487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a493/11557969/718c90e905c5/41598_2024_79487_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The analgesic effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with popliteal plexus block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.连续收肌管阻滞联合隐神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79487-9.
2
The effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with distal interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.连续收肌管阻滞联合膝后囊与腘窝间隙阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的效果:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01712-7.
3
Postoperative continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty improves pain and functional recovery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.全膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞对改善疼痛和功能恢复的效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Is continuous catheter adductor canal block better than single-shot canal adductor canal block in primary total knee arthroplasty?: A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.在初次全膝关节置换术中,连续股内收肌管阻滞是否优于单次股内收肌管阻滞?:通过系统评价和荟萃分析对证据进行的GRADE分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20320. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020320.
5
Analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.膝关节囊旁和腘窝动脉阻滞(iPACK)复合局部浸润麻醉与连续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后镇痛效果的随机临床试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Nov;45(11):872-879. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101396. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
6
Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.连续收肌管阻滞优于单独收肌管阻滞或收肌管阻滞联合 IPACK 阻滞(腘动脉和膝关节后囊之间的间隙)在全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和活动:随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00682-8. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
7
Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.连续收肌管阻滞优于初次全膝关节置换术后单次注射:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Effectiveness of continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA guided systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术患者中持续收肌管阻滞与持续股神经阻滞的有效性:一项循证医学系统评价与Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e18056. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018056.
9
Which is the best analgesia treatment for total knee arthroplasty: Adductor canal block, periarticular infiltration, or liposomal bupivacaine? A network meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术的最佳镇痛治疗方法是什么:收肌管阻滞、关节周围浸润还是脂质体布比卡因?一项网状Meta分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110098. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110098. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
Single-Injection Adductor Canal Block With Multiple Adjuvants Provides Equivalent Analgesia When Compared With Continuous Adductor Canal Blockade for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Equivalency Trial.单次注射收肌管阻滞联合多种辅助药物与连续收肌管阻滞用于初次全膝关节置换术的等效镇痛:一项双盲、随机、对照、等效性试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3160-3166.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Analgesic Volume for Popliteal Plexus Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Blinded RCT Protocol.全膝关节置换术后腘窝神经丛阻滞的最佳镇痛剂量:一项双盲随机对照试验方案
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70057. doi: 10.1111/aas.70057.
2
Fascial plane blocks for postoperative pain management after fast-track total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review.快速康复全膝关节置换术后用于疼痛管理的筋膜平面阻滞:一项叙述性综述。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Apr-Jun;19(2):209-220. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_99_25. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of popliteal plexus block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.全膝关节置换术后腘神经丛阻滞的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jul 16. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105747.
2
Multimodal Analgesia.多模式镇痛。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2022 Sep;40(3):455-468. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
3
Chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: The potential contributions of synovitis, pain sensitization and pain catastrophizing-An explorative study.全膝关节置换术后慢性术后疼痛:滑膜炎、痛觉敏化和疼痛灾难化的潜在作用——一项探索性研究。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Oct;26(9):1979-1989. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2018. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
The effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with distal interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.连续收肌管阻滞联合膝后囊与腘窝间隙阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的效果:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01712-7.
5
The Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Posterior Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Block in Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial.膝关节置换术中腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙(IPACK)阻滞:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2022 May;25(3):E427-E433.
6
Analgesic Impact of a Popliteal Plexus Block to Standard Adductor Canal Block in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Blind Clinical Trial.关节镜下前交叉韧带重建中隐神经髌下支阻滞对标准收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机盲法临床试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 17;2021:1723471. doi: 10.1155/2021/1723471. eCollection 2021.
7
Adductor Canal Block Combined With IPACK Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Function Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.收肌管阻滞联合 IPACK 阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛和功能恢复的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
8
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty.随机比较囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与骼腹股沟筋膜阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
Infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block in knee surgery: a narrative review.膝关节手术中腘动脉和膝关节囊之间的浸润(IPACK)阻滞:叙述性综述。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):784-805. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102681. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Does the addition of iPACK to adductor canal block in the presence or absence of periarticular local anesthetic infiltration improve analgesic and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在关节周围局部麻醉浸润存在或不存在的情况下,向收肌管阻滞中加入 iPACK 是否能改善全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和功能结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):713-721. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102705. Epub 2021 May 14.