Center for the Study and Integrated Treatment of Obesity (CeSTIO), Internal Medicine 3, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Sport and Exercise Medicine Division, Regional Center for the Therapeutic Prescription of Exercise in Chronic Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Sep;45(9):1949-1957. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00856-9. Epub 2021 May 14.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Different approaches are used to classify obesity severity. Beyond classical anthropometric measurements, the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) considers medical, physical and psychological parameters. However, this method has some limitations, principally due to the absence of an objective measure for physical impairment. The aim of our study is thus to overcome this limitation suggesting a new functional parameter obtained by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), i.e., cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), expressed as weight-adjusted peak oxygen consumption (VOpeak/kg).
SUBJECTS/METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study conducted on a population of 843 patients affected by obesity finally enrolled 500 subjects. Every patient underwent clinical, anthropometric, biochemical assessment and CPET. First, participants have been classified according to standard EOSS in five stages. Second, patients were reclassified according to the new modified EOSS (EOSS-CRF) based on their age- and gender-appropriate VOpeak/kg percentiles as reported in the healthy normal-weight population of the FRIEND registry.
VOpeak/kg was significantly different between standard EOSS classes 1 and 2 and classes 1 and 3 (ANCOVA p model = 0.004), whereas patients in classes 2 and 3 showed similar CRF. The EOSS-CRF classification varied in number of patients in each class compared to EOSS, particularly with a shift from class 2 to class 3. Moreover, CRF showed that physical impairment is less addressed by EOSS when compared to EOSS-CRF.
The integration of EOSS with CRF allowed us to assign to each patient a severity index that considers not only clinical parameters, but also their functional impairment through a quantitative and prognostically important parameter (VOpeak/kg). This improvement of the staging system may also provide a better approach to identify individuals at increased risk of mortality leading to targeted therapeutic management and prognostic risk stratification for patients with obesity.
背景/目的:有不同的方法用于对肥胖严重程度进行分类。除了经典的人体测量学测量外,埃德蒙顿肥胖分期系统(EOSS)还考虑了医学、身体和心理参数。然而,这种方法存在一些局限性,主要是由于缺乏对身体损伤的客观衡量。因此,我们的研究旨在克服这一局限性,提出一种新的功能参数,该参数通过心肺运动测试(CPET)获得,即心肺功能(CRF),表示为体重校正后的峰值摄氧量(VOpeak/kg)。
受试者/方法:这项基于人群的观察性横断面研究共纳入了 843 名肥胖患者,最终纳入了 500 名受试者。每位患者均接受了临床、人体测量学、生化评估和 CPET 检查。首先,根据标准 EOSS 将患者分为五期。其次,根据新的改良 EOSS(EOSS-CRF),根据 FRIDEN 登记处健康正常体重人群中报告的年龄和性别适当的 VOpeak/kg 百分位数,重新对患者进行分类。
VOpeak/kg 在标准 EOSS 1 期和 2 期与 1 期和 3 期之间差异显著(ANCOVA p 模型=0.004),而 2 期和 3 期患者的 CRF 相似。与 EOSS 相比,EOSS-CRF 分类中每个类别的患者数量有所不同,特别是从 2 期转移到 3 期。此外,CRF 表明 EOSS 对身体损伤的评估不如 EOSS-CRF 全面。
将 EOSS 与 CRF 相结合,使我们能够为每位患者分配一个严重程度指数,该指数不仅考虑了临床参数,还考虑了通过定量和预后重要参数(VOpeak/kg)对其功能损伤的评估。这种分期系统的改进还可以提供一种更好的方法来识别死亡风险增加的个体,从而为肥胖患者提供有针对性的治疗管理和预后风险分层。