Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250001,China.
Department of Reproductive Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Aug 18;106(9):e3533-e3545. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab340.
Obesity management prior to infertility treatment remains a challenge. To date, results from randomized clinical trials involving weight loss by lifestyle interventions have shown no evidence of improved live birth rate.
This work aimed to determine whether pharmacologic weight-loss intervention before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) can improve live birth rate among overweight or obese women.
We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial across 19 reproductive medical centers in China, from July 2017 to January 2019. A total of 877 infertile women scheduled for IVF who had a body mass index of 25 or greater were randomly assigned to receive orlistat (n = 439) or placebo (n = 438) treatment for 4 to 12 weeks. The main outcome measurement was the live birth rate after fresh ET.
The live birth rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups (112 of 439 [25.5%] with orlistat and 112 of 438 [25.6%] with placebo; P = .984). No significant differences existed between the groups as to the rates of conception, clinical pregnancy, or pregnancy loss. A statistically significant increase in singleton birth weight was observed after orlistat treatment (3487.50 g vs 3285.17 g in the placebo group; P = .039). The mean change in body weight during the intervention was -2.49 kg in the orlistat group, as compared to -1.22 kg in the placebo group, with a significant difference (P = .005).
Orlistat treatment, prior to IVF-ET, did not improve the live birth rate among overweight or obese women, although it was beneficial for weight reduction.
不孕治疗前的肥胖管理仍然是一个挑战。迄今为止,涉及生活方式干预减肥的随机临床试验结果均未显示出活产率提高的证据。
本研究旨在确定体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)前药物减肥干预是否可以提高超重或肥胖妇女的活产率。
我们在中国的 19 个生殖医学中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 1 月进行。共有 877 名计划接受 IVF 的不孕妇女,BMI 为 25 或更高,随机分为接受奥利司他(n=439)或安慰剂(n=438)治疗 4 至 12 周。主要结局测量是新鲜 ET 后的活产率。
两组活产率无显著差异(奥利司他组 439 例中有 112 例[25.5%],安慰剂组 438 例中有 112 例[25.6%];P=0.984)。两组之间的受孕率、临床妊娠率或妊娠丢失率无显著差异。奥利司他治疗后单胎出生体重显著增加(3487.50g 比安慰剂组 3285.17g;P=0.039)。奥利司他组干预期间体重平均变化为-2.49kg,安慰剂组为-1.22kg,差异有统计学意义(P=0.005)。
在 IVF-ET 之前,奥利司他治疗并未提高超重或肥胖妇女的活产率,但对减肥有益。