University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Card Fail. 2021 Nov;27(11):1185-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 13.
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization among adults in the United States. Nurse-led interprofessional clinics have been shown to improve heart failure outcomes in patients with heart failure, specifically decreasing readmission rates. Yet, there is little information on the impact of nurse-led interprofessional collaborative practice within an underserved population with heart failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the differences in readmission days and cost in patients followed by an interprofessional collaborative practice clinic (both engaged and not engaged) and those who did not establish care with the clinic.
Demographic, clinical, and readmission data were compared among patients with heart failure (59% African American; 72% male; mean age, 49 years) stratified into 3 groups: engaged patients (n = 170), not-engaged patients (n = 103), and not-established patients (n = 111) who had an initial appointment to clinic but did not establish care. Patients with 6 months of data before and after the scheduled clinic visit were included in the study. Differences in baseline characteristics, frequency and length of hospital admissions, and costs were analyzed using analysis of variance, Wilcoxon matched-pairs testing, multivariate analysis of variance, logistic regression, and financial analytics. Overall, the number of inpatient hospital days decreased in the engaged group compared with those in the not-engaged and not-established groups (P < .001). The total cost savings were significantly greater in the engaged group ($1,987,379) (P < .001).
The findings of this study may steer health care providers to incorporate interprofessional collaborative practice into heart failure management with a particular focus on underserved populations.
心力衰竭是导致美国成年人住院的主要原因。研究表明,护士主导的多专业联合诊所可以改善心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭预后,特别是降低再入院率。然而,关于在心力衰竭的服务不足人群中,护士主导的多专业协作实践对患者的影响,信息甚少。因此,本研究的目的是比较接受多专业协作实践诊所(参与和未参与)治疗的患者与未与诊所建立联系的患者的再入院天数和费用差异。
根据心力衰竭患者(59%为非裔美国人;72%为男性;平均年龄 49 岁)的人口统计学、临床和再入院数据,将患者分为 3 组:参与组(n=170)、不参与组(n=103)和未建立组(n=111)。参与组患者有初始预约,但未建立联系。将有 6 个月的门诊前后数据的患者纳入研究。采用方差分析、Wilcoxon 配对检验、多变量方差分析、逻辑回归和财务分析比较基线特征、住院频率和住院时间以及费用差异。总体而言,与不参与组和未建立组相比,参与组的住院天数减少(P<0.001)。参与组的总节省费用显著更高($1987379)(P<0.001)。
本研究的结果可能会引导医疗保健提供者将多专业协作实践纳入心力衰竭管理,特别是针对服务不足的人群。