Department of Hydrobiology and Ecosystems Protections, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Dobrzańskiego 37, Lublin 20-262, Poland.
GEMMA-Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, c/ Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 15;787:147615. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147615. Epub 2021 May 7.
One of the key features of nature-based solutions (NBSs) is their high effectiveness and economic and resource efficiency in solving problems compared to traditional grey interventions. These aspects, however, have so far attracted little attention in the literature but should be considered, as the evaluation of NBS projects before implementation provides an opportunity to use them as practical tools. This paper aims to present a new evaluation framework of NBS projects (at the stage of solution selection) based on the application of performance questions and the indicators approach. The framework consists of three main stages: (1) the formulation of the project aim(s), including the problem(s) to be solved, the scales of the expected effects and the thresholds to be achieved; (2) the elimination of solutions that do not fit the local conditions and setting requirements; and (3) the examination of the performance questions. To consider the whole spectrum of influencing factors, a systematic review was performed to indicate the main concepts related to the issue of NBS effectiveness, including (1) stakeholders' participation, (2) policy and management capability, (3) economic efficiency, (4) analysis of synergies and trade-offs, (5) adaptation to local conditions, (6) adequate spatial scale and (7) performance in the long term. In the current study around 130 indicators were identified for the evaluation of NBS projects. Regarding the impact on the state of knowledge, the present work contributes to the discussion on the conceptual sphere of NBS and its practical implementation by introducing multi-perspective standards and guidelines for the selection of possible NBS projects, and it deals with the complexity of synergies and the trade-offs between benefits.
基于自然的解决方案(NBSs)的一个关键特点是,与传统的灰色干预措施相比,它们在解决问题方面具有很高的效果和经济及资源效率。然而,这些方面在文献中迄今为止并没有引起太多关注,但应该考虑到,因为在实施前对 NBS 项目进行评估提供了一个机会,可以将其用作实用工具。本文旨在提出一个基于绩效问题和指标方法应用的 NBS 项目评估新框架(在解决方案选择阶段)。该框架由三个主要阶段组成:(1)项目目标的制定,包括要解决的问题、预期效果的规模和要达到的阈值;(2)消除不适合当地条件和设定要求的解决方案;(3)检验绩效问题。为了考虑所有影响因素,进行了系统回顾,以指出与 NBS 效果问题相关的主要概念,包括(1)利益相关者的参与,(2)政策和管理能力,(3)经济效益,(4)协同作用和权衡分析,(5)适应当地条件,(6)适当的空间规模和(7)长期绩效。在当前的研究中,大约确定了 130 个指标用于评估 NBS 项目。关于对知识状况的影响,本工作通过引入多视角的标准和准则来讨论 NBS 的概念领域及其实际实施,用于选择可能的 NBS 项目,并处理协同作用的复杂性和效益之间的权衡。