State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 15;787:147528. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147528. Epub 2021 May 6.
Limited information is available on the spatiotemporal occurrence and ecological risks of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in coastal environments. 175 water samples were collected in Laizhou Bay (LZB) and its rivers and estuaries during spring and summer for the determination of 12 targeted OPEs. Total concentration of OPEs ranged from 234.4 to 2892.1 ng L in the river and estuarine water and 87.6 to 969.4 ng L in the bay water, with medians of 1015.8 and 296.8 ng L, respectively, showing that riverine inputs were the major sources of OPEs in the bay. Tris (2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) and triethyl phosphate (TEP) were the most abundant OPEs, with median contributions of 47% and 36% in the bay water, respectively. The total concentration of OPEs was higher in the estuarine area of the Yellow River and the southwestern coast of the LZB under the influence of riverine OPE inputs and ocean currents. In addition, the concentrations of dominant OPE species were significantly higher in the surface water than in the bottom water. The concentrations of dominant OPE species were found to be significantly lower in summer than in spring, mainly due to both precipitation and seawater dilution effects. However, the concentrations of three minor OPE species were significantly higher in summer than in spring, probably because of their high usage in summer. TCIPP and TEP concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with salinity. The targeted OPEs posed low ecological risk in the bay and moderate ecological risk in the rivers and estuaries, which was mostly ascribed to the toxicity of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and resorcinol-bis (diphenyl) phosphate (RDP) to algae. Priority should be given to TCIPP, TEP, TCEP, and RDP in the LZB due to their high concentrations and/or toxicity.
有关沿海环境中有机磷酸酯(OPEs)的时空分布和生态风险的信息有限。本研究于春、夏两季在莱州湾及其河流和入海口采集了 175 个水样,以测定 12 种目标 OPEs。在河口水和入海口水中,OPEs 的总浓度范围为 234.4 至 2892.1 ng/L,中位数分别为 1015.8 和 296.8 ng/L;在湾水中,OPEs 的总浓度范围为 87.6 至 969.4 ng/L,中位数为 296.8 ng/L,表明河流输入是海湾 OPEs 的主要来源。三(2-氯异丙基)磷酸酯(TCIPP)和三乙基磷酸酯(TEP)是最丰富的 OPEs,在湾水中的中位数贡献分别为 47%和 36%。在黄河入海口和莱州湾西南海岸受河流 OPE 输入和海流影响的河口区域,OPEs 的总浓度较高。此外,优势 OPE 种类的浓度在表层水中明显高于底层水中。优势 OPE 种类的浓度在夏季明显低于春季,主要是由于降水和海水稀释的影响。然而,三种次要 OPE 种类的浓度在夏季明显高于春季,可能是由于它们在夏季的高使用率。TCIPP 和 TEP 浓度与盐度呈显著负相关。目标 OPEs 在海湾中的生态风险较低,在河流和入海口中的生态风险为中等,这主要归因于三氯乙基磷酸酯(TCEP)和间苯二酚双(二苯基)磷酸酯(RDP)对藻类的毒性。由于 TCIPP、TEP、TCEP 和 RDP 浓度较高和/或毒性较大,应优先考虑它们在莱州湾的使用。