• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining primary care physician rationale for not following geriatric choosing wisely recommendations.检查初级保健医生不遵循老年选择明智建议的理由。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 15;22(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01440-w.
2
Physician perceptions of Choosing Wisely and drivers of overuse.医生对“明智选择”及过度医疗驱动因素的看法。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(5):337-43.
3
A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada.一项关于初级保健患者参与加拿大明智选择运动所推荐的弃用医疗行为的意愿的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10;9:301. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2103-6.
4
Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study.医生对选择明智加拿大作为减少不必要医疗的方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 26;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0370-5.
5
Has Choosing Wisely® affected rates of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry use?“明智选择”(Choosing Wisely®)是否影响了双能X线吸收测定法的使用频率?
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jul;27(7):2311-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3511-0. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
6
[Toward a "Choosing Wisely" Future in Medicine].迈向医学领域“明智选择”的未来
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2019;139(4):547-550. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.18-00181-1.
7
Low-value wound care: Are nurses and physicians choosing wisely? A mixed methods study.低价值伤口护理:护士和医生的选择明智吗?一项混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2023 Dec;29(6):e13170. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13170. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
8
What influences clinicians to choose wisely?是什么影响临床医生做出明智的选择?
N Z Med J. 2019 Sep 20;132(1502):16-24.
9
Choosing Wisely in Critical Care: Results of a National Survey From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative.明智选择在重症监护:来自重症监护学会协作组的全国性调查结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):331-336. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003496.
10
Clinician-Level Variation in Three Measures Representing Overuse Based on the American Geriatrics Society Choosing Wisely Statement.基于美国老年医学会“明智选择”声明的三项代表过度医疗措施的临床医生层面差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1797-1802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05748-8. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Care Overuse in Older Patients Using Professional Norms and Accountability : A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.利用专业规范和问责制减少老年患者的过度医疗:一项群组随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Mar;177(3):324-334. doi: 10.7326/M23-2183. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners' Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review.影响基层医疗从业者为老年人进行癌症筛查建议的因素:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2998-3020. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Development and pilot testing of EHR-nudges to reduce overuse in older primary care patients.电子健康记录干预措施的开发和试点测试,以减少老年初级保健患者的过度医疗。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jan;104:104794. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104794. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
A Qualitative Description of Clinician Free-Text Rationales Entered within Accountable Justification Interventions.临床医生在问责性说明干预中输入的自由文本理由的定性描述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Aug;13(4):820-827. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756366. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening tests in the last five years reported by men in the United States in 2010, 2015, and 2018.2010 年、2015 年和 2018 年,美国男性报告的过去五年中进行的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查测试次数。
Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):192.e19-192.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
6
Design of Behavioral Economic Applications to Geriatrics Leveraging Electronic Health Records (BEAGLE): A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.利用电子健康记录设计针对老年医学的行为经济学应用(BEAGLE):一项实用的聚类随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106649. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106649. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician Perspectives on Overscreening for Cancer in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy.临床医生对预期寿命有限的老年癌症过度筛查的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1462-1468. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16415. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
When Guidelines Recommend Shared Decision-making.当指南推荐共同决策时。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1345-1346. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1525.
3
Clinician-Level Variation in Three Measures Representing Overuse Based on the American Geriatrics Society Choosing Wisely Statement.基于美国老年医学会“明智选择”声明的三项代表过度医疗措施的临床医生层面差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1797-1802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05748-8. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
12. Older Adults: .12. 老年人: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S152-S162. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S012.
5
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.美国传染病学会 2019 年无症状菌尿管理临床实践指南更新版。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 2;68(10):1611-1615. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz021.
6
Threatened efficiency not autonomy: Prescriber perceptions of an established pediatric antimicrobial stewardship program.受威胁的不是自主权,而是效率:对既定儿科抗菌药物管理计划的开方者认知。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):522-527. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.47. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712.
8
Older Adults' Views and Communication Preferences About Cancer Screening Cessation.老年人对停止癌症筛查的看法及沟通偏好
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1778.
9
Impact of antibiotic choices made in the emergency department on appropriateness of antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients.急诊科抗生素选择对住院患者尿路感染抗生素治疗适宜性的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Mar;11(3):181-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2508. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
10
Potential overtreatment of diabetes mellitus in older adults with tight glycemic control.老年糖尿病患者强化血糖控制可能存在过度治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):356-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7345.

检查初级保健医生不遵循老年选择明智建议的理由。

Examining primary care physician rationale for not following geriatric choosing wisely recommendations.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lakeshore Dr. 10th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 15;22(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01440-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-021-01440-w
PMID:33992080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8126116/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective is to understand why physicians order tests or treatments in older adults contrary to published recommendations.

METHODS

Participants: Physicians above the median for ≥ 1 measures of overuse representing 3 Choosing Wisely topics.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants evaluated decisions in a semi-structured interview regarding: 1) Screening men aged ≥ 76 with prostate specific antigen 2) Ordering urine studies in women ≥ 65 without symptoms 3) Overtreating adults aged ≥ 75 with insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications. Two investigators independently coded transcripts using qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen interviews were conducted across the three topics resulting in four themes. First, physicians were aware and knowledgeable of guidelines. Second, perceived patient preference towards overuse influenced physician action even when physicians felt strongly that testing was not indicated. Third, physicians overestimated benefits of a test and underemphasized potential harms. Fourth, physicians were resistant to change when patients appeared to be doing well.

CONCLUSIONS

Though physicians expressed awareness to avoid overuse, deference to patient preferences and the tendency to distort the chance of benefit over harm influenced decisions to order testing. Approaches for decreasing unnecessary testing must account for perceived patient preferences, make the potential harms of overtesting salient, and address clinical inertia among patients who appear to be doing well.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在了解为什么医生会违背已发表的建议,为老年人开出与建议不符的检查或治疗方案。

方法

参与者:在 3 个“明智选择”主题中,至少有 1 项过度医疗指标高于中位数的医生。

测量

参与者在半结构化访谈中评估了以下决策:1)对年龄≥76 岁的男性进行前列腺特异性抗原筛查;2)对无相关症状的年龄≥65 岁女性进行尿液检查;3)对年龄≥75 岁的成年人过度使用胰岛素或口服降糖药物。两名研究人员使用定性分析方法独立对转录本进行编码。

结果

在三个主题中进行了 19 次访谈,得出了四个主题。首先,医生了解并熟知指南。其次,即使医生强烈认为不需要进行检查,但他们认为患者有过度医疗的偏好,这会影响医生的决策。第三,医生高估了检查的益处,而低估了潜在的危害。第四,当患者看起来病情良好时,医生会抗拒改变。

结论

尽管医生表示希望避免过度医疗,但对患者偏好的尊重以及对获益与危害的可能性的扭曲会影响他们进行检查的决策。减少不必要检查的方法必须考虑到患者的偏好,使过度检查的潜在危害凸显,并解决那些看起来病情良好的患者的临床惰性问题。