• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜脊柱手术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of endoscopic spine surgery and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gupo Sungshim Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jun;88:5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.030
PMID:33992203
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) through meta-analysis. The Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for studies that evaluated the outcomes of ESS and MIS-TLIF in DLD, including visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain, VAS score for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications published between January 2000 and August 2020. Two authors extracted the data independently. Any discrepancies were resolved by a consensus. Four comparative studies were identified. No significant differences were found between the ESS and MIS-TLIF groups in terms of VAS score for back pain, VAS score for leg pain, and ODI, except for complication rate. The complication rate was higher in the ESS than in the MIS-TLIF group. A literature review identified four comparative studies reporting the clinical outcomes of ESS and MIS-TLIF for DLD. Despite the heterogeneity, a limited number of meta-analyses showed that the clinical outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different except for complication rate. Hence, further large-scale multicenter studies are required to validate our results.

摘要

本研究旨在通过荟萃分析比较内镜下脊柱手术(ESS)和微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗退行性腰椎疾病(DLD)的临床疗效。通过 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 8 月期间评估 ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 在 DLD 中应用的疗效评估研究,包括腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腿痛 VAS 评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和并发症。两名作者独立提取数据。任何分歧均通过共识解决。确定了四项比较研究。ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 组在腰痛 VAS 评分、腿痛 VAS 评分和 ODI 方面无显著差异,但并发症发生率除外。ESS 组的并发症发生率高于 MIS-TLIF 组。文献回顾确定了四项比较研究报告了 ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 治疗 DLD 的临床疗效。尽管存在异质性,但少数几项荟萃分析表明,两组之间的临床疗效无显著差异,除了并发症发生率。因此,需要进一步进行大规模多中心研究来验证我们的结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of endoscopic spine surgery and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: A meta-analysis.内镜脊柱手术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jun;88:5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与腰椎外侧椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):755-770. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0806-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
3
Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.在一家三甲医院比较经皮内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的初步临床疗效:经皮内镜术优于微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与内镜下腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 May 27;18(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03875-6.
6
Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e352-e368. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.109. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
7
Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经皮全内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合置钉术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的早期临床评估。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):328-337. doi: 10.1111/os.12900. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
8
Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与经皮椎间孔镜腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较:一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e1231-e1240. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.后路腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗三级退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效比较
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9540298. doi: 10.1155/2016/9540298. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Comparison of the short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF for the treatment of two-segment lumbar degenerative disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与内镜下经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗两节段腰椎退行性疾病的短期疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 4;25(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07815-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Is endoscopic technique an effective and safe alternative for lumbar interbody fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜技术是腰椎椎间融合的有效且安全的替代方法吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Jun 3;9(6):536-555. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0167.
2
Robotic endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A single institution case series.机器人辅助内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:单机构病例系列
World Neurosurg X. 2024 May 1;23:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100390. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与传统椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 24;24(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06949-y.
4
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) compared with MIS-TLIF for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients: A retrospective cohort study.经皮椎间孔镜手术(PTES)与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病的疗效及安全性比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 17;9:1083953. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1083953. eCollection 2022.
5
Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Management of Spinal Foraminal Schwannomas: Case Series.经皮全内镜下治疗脊柱神经鞘瘤:病例系列。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023 May 1;24(5):483-491. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000570. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的双门内镜技术:当前研究综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S84-S92. doi: 10.14444/8167.