Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gupo Sungshim Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jun;88:5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) through meta-analysis. The Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for studies that evaluated the outcomes of ESS and MIS-TLIF in DLD, including visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain, VAS score for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications published between January 2000 and August 2020. Two authors extracted the data independently. Any discrepancies were resolved by a consensus. Four comparative studies were identified. No significant differences were found between the ESS and MIS-TLIF groups in terms of VAS score for back pain, VAS score for leg pain, and ODI, except for complication rate. The complication rate was higher in the ESS than in the MIS-TLIF group. A literature review identified four comparative studies reporting the clinical outcomes of ESS and MIS-TLIF for DLD. Despite the heterogeneity, a limited number of meta-analyses showed that the clinical outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different except for complication rate. Hence, further large-scale multicenter studies are required to validate our results.
本研究旨在通过荟萃分析比较内镜下脊柱手术(ESS)和微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)治疗退行性腰椎疾病(DLD)的临床疗效。通过 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 8 月期间评估 ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 在 DLD 中应用的疗效评估研究,包括腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腿痛 VAS 评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和并发症。两名作者独立提取数据。任何分歧均通过共识解决。确定了四项比较研究。ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 组在腰痛 VAS 评分、腿痛 VAS 评分和 ODI 方面无显著差异,但并发症发生率除外。ESS 组的并发症发生率高于 MIS-TLIF 组。文献回顾确定了四项比较研究报告了 ESS 和 MIS-TLIF 治疗 DLD 的临床疗效。尽管存在异质性,但少数几项荟萃分析表明,两组之间的临床疗效无显著差异,除了并发症发生率。因此,需要进一步进行大规模多中心研究来验证我们的结果。