Suppr超能文献

普拉提与一般运动及教育工作坊对神经肌肉参数的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of the Pilates versus general exercises versus educational workshops on neuromuscular parameters: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mendes Tozim Beatriz, Thomaz de Aquino Nava Guilherme, Zuliani Stroppa Marques Ana Elisa, Tavella Navega Marcelo

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Physical Education, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:420-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Muscle strength, flexibility and changes in muscle recruitment patterns are usually associated to low back pain (LBP). Physical exercises can reverse the adverse changes associated to LBP.

OBJECTIVES

Compare Pilates, general exercises and educational workshop on muscle flexibility, strength and recruitment of the trunk extensor muscles in women with LBP.

METHODS

Forty-six women were randomly divided into Pilates group (PG, n = 16), general exercise group (GEG, n = 15), and educational group (EG, n = 15). This study sought to determine flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle recruitment of right (RIL), left (LIL) iliocostalis lumbar; right (RMU) and left (LMU) lumbar multifidus muscles. Both PG and GEG performed 16 exercise sessions, while EG attended 4 workshops. Statistical analysis used data sample from Shapiro-Wilk test, Pearson's correlation, multivariate analysis, mixed variance analysis, and Cohen's index.

RESULTS

Flexibility showed no differences (p > 0.05). Muscle strength increased in the intragroup analysis for PG (p = 0.003) and GEG (p = 0.002); however, the intergroup analysis presented no difference. Intergroup showed statistically significant differences for the recruitment of RMU in PG (p < 0.001). Intragroup analysis presented differences after interventions in PG for RIL (p = 0.001); in GEG for LIL (p = 0.005); and in EG for RIL (p = 0.007), LIL (p = 0.002) and RMU (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the groups showed flexibility improvements. PG and GEG increased muscle strength through intragroup analysis. Intergroup analysis showed an increase in recruitment of the RMU muscle in PG and all groups demonstrated significant improvements in the intragroup analysis.

摘要

引言

肌肉力量、柔韧性以及肌肉募集模式的变化通常与腰痛(LBP)相关。体育锻炼可以逆转与腰痛相关的不良变化。

目的

比较普拉提、一般锻炼和教育工作坊对患有腰痛的女性的肌肉柔韧性、力量以及躯干伸肌募集的影响。

方法

46名女性被随机分为普拉提组(PG,n = 16)、一般锻炼组(GEG,n = 15)和教育组(EG,n = 15)。本研究旨在确定右侧(RIL)、左侧(LIL)腰髂肋肌;右侧(RMU)和左侧(LMU)腰多裂肌的柔韧性、肌肉力量和肌肉募集情况。PG组和GEG组都进行了16次锻炼课程,而EG组参加了4次工作坊。统计分析使用了来自夏皮罗-威尔克检验、皮尔逊相关性、多变量分析、混合方差分析和科恩指数的数据样本。

结果

柔韧性没有差异(p > 0.05)。PG组(p = 0.003)和GEG组(p = 0.002)的组内分析显示肌肉力量增加;然而,组间分析没有差异。PG组中RMU的募集在组间显示出统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.001)。组内分析显示,PG组干预后RIL有差异(p = 0.001);GEG组干预后LIL有差异(p = 0.005);EG组干预后RIL(p = 0.007)、LIL(p = 0.002)和RMU(p < 0.001)有差异。

结论

没有一组显示出柔韧性的改善。PG组和GEG组通过组内分析增加了肌肉力量。组间分析显示PG组中RMU肌肉的募集增加,并且所有组在组内分析中都显示出显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验