• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国阴茎异常勃起诉讼案例综述。

Review of Priapism Litigation in the United States.

机构信息

New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.

Department of Urology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY.

出版信息

Urology. 2021 Oct;156:169-172. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.001
PMID:33992665
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review medical malpractice trends and to identify the most common claims filed against medical providers for the management of patients with priapism.

METHODS

Using the Westlaw legal database, a search was done for the keyword "priapism" between July 1, 1980 and July 1, 2020. Cases were evaluated for plaintiff demographics, reasons for filing claims, management outcomes, legal verdicts and awards and further categorized based upon the timing of the alleged malpractice.

RESULTS

Alleged negligence during the pre-management period was cited in 30 cases. Administration of psychotropic medications was the most common reasons for filing pre-management claims 22/56 (39.3%). Delay in care accounted for 18/56 (32.1%) and complications of surgery were 5/56 (8.9%) of claims. The majority of the completed cases were in favor of the defendants (39/47; 83.0%). There was no association between type of health care provider or timing of alleged malpractice and ultimate verdict.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing psychoactive medications without warning of the adverse effect profile is the most common reason for claims filed against providers with trazodone as the leading medication. Medical providers should ensure that patients are well informed of this adverse effect prior to prescription. Regardless, the majority of medical malpractice cases carry a verdict in favor of the defendant.

摘要

目的

回顾医疗事故趋势,并确定针对阴茎异常勃起患者管理提起的最常见医疗服务提供者索赔。

方法

使用 Westlaw 法律数据库,自 1980 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 1 日期间,对“priapism”一词进行了检索。评估了案例中的原告人口统计学、提起索赔的原因、管理结果、法律判决和裁决,并根据涉嫌医疗事故的时间进一步进行了分类。

结果

30 例中提到了管理前阶段的疏忽行为。管理前提出索赔的最常见原因是服用精神药物,共 22/56(39.3%)。治疗延迟占 18/56(32.1%),手术并发症占 5/56(8.9%)。已结案的大多数案例都有利于被告(39/47;83.0%)。医疗服务提供者类型或涉嫌医疗事故时间与最终判决之间无关联。

结论

在没有警告不良影响的情况下开具精神药物是针对曲唑酮等药物提供者提起的索赔的最常见原因。医疗服务提供者应确保在处方前让患者充分了解这种不良反应。无论如何,大多数医疗事故案件的判决都有利于被告。

相似文献

1
Review of Priapism Litigation in the United States.美国阴茎异常勃起诉讼案例综述。
Urology. 2021 Oct;156:169-172. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.延迟诊断是肉瘤诉讼的主要原因:美国医疗事故索赔分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340.
3
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.脊柱手术后的医疗事故诉讼。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.美国联邦和州干预性疼痛医疗过失诉讼的描述性分析:一项初步调查。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):413-422.
5
A 30-Year Review of Cystectomy Litigation.膀胱切除术诉讼的30年回顾。
Urol Pract. 2021 Jan;8(1):18-22. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000173. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Medical malpractice litigation after total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis based on the Westlaw legal database.全肩关节置换术后的医疗事故诉讼:基于 Westlaw 法律数据库的综合分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
7
Analysis of the Reasons for Medical Malpractice Litigation Due to Facet Injections.小关节注射导致医疗事故诉讼的原因分析
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35015. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
A 40-Year Litigation Review of Transurethral Surgeries for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的 40 年诉讼回顾。
Urology. 2022 Oct;168:165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
9
Litigation involving sports-related spinal injuries: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the United States in the past 70 years.涉及与运动相关的脊柱损伤的诉讼:对美国过去70年报告的法律索赔的全面回顾。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Litigation in Hand Surgery: A 30-Year Review.手部外科诉讼:30 年回顾。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;146(4):430e-438e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007157.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Trazodone Be First-Line Therapy for Insomnia? A Clinical Suitability Appraisal.曲唑酮应作为失眠的一线治疗药物吗?一项临床适用性评估。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2933. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082933.
2
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and priapism: An unexplored association.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与阴茎异常勃起:一种未被探索的关联。
Curr Urol. 2022 Jun;16(2):55-62. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000111. Epub 2022 Jun 27.