J.A. van Lint, PharmD, N.T. Jessurun, PharmD, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch;
J.A. van Lint, PharmD, N.T. Jessurun, PharmD, Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch.
J Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;48(9):1388-1394. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201373. Epub 2021 May 15.
We aimed to describe the nature and frequency of gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions (GI-ADRs) of etanercept (ETN) using patient-reported and healthcare professional (HCP)-registered data and compared this frequency with the GI-ADR frequency of the widely used tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor adalimumab (ADA).
Reported GI-ADRs of ETN for rheumatic diseases were collected from the Dutch Biologic Monitor and DREAM registries. We described the clinical course of GI-ADRs and compared the frequency with ADA in both data sources using Fisher exact test.
Out of 416 patients using ETN for inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the Dutch Biologic Monitor, 25 (6%) patients reported 36 GI-ADRs. In the DREAM registries 11 GI-ADRs were registered for 9 patients (2.3%), out of 399 patients using ETN, with an incidence of 7.1 per 1000 patient-years. Most GI-ADRs consisted of diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain. GI-ADRs led to ETN discontinuation in 1 patient (4%) and dose adjustment in 4 (16%) in the Dutch Biologic Monitor. Eight GI-ADRs (73%) led to ETN discontinuation in the DREAM registries. The frequency of GI-ADRs of ETN did not significantly differ from GI-ADRs of ADA in both data sources (Dutch Biologic Monitor: ETN 8.7% vs ADA 5.3%, = 0.07; DREAM: ETN 2.8% vs ADA 4.7%, = 0.16).
Most GI-ADRs associated with ETN concerned gastrointestinal symptoms. These ADRs may lead to dose adjustment or ETN discontinuation. The frequency of ETN-associated GI-ADRs was comparable to the frequency of ADA-associated GI-ADRs. Knowledge about these previously unknown ADRs can facilitate early recognition and improve patient communication.
本研究旨在使用患者报告和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)注册的数据,描述依那西普(ETN)的胃肠道不良药物反应(GI-ADR)的性质和频率,并将其与广泛使用的肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂阿达木单抗(ADA)的 GI-ADR 频率进行比较。
从荷兰生物监测和 DREAM 登记处收集了用于治疗风湿性疾病的 ETN 报告的 GI-ADR。我们描述了 GI-ADR 的临床过程,并使用 Fisher 精确检验在这两个数据源中比较 ADA 的频率。
在荷兰生物监测处使用 ETN 治疗炎症性风湿性疾病的 416 名患者中,有 25 名(6%)患者报告了 36 例 GI-ADR。在 DREAM 登记处,有 9 名患者(2.3%)报告了 11 例 GI-ADR,共使用 ETN 的 399 名患者中,发病率为 7.1/1000 患者年。大多数 GI-ADR 由腹泻、恶心和腹痛组成。在荷兰生物监测处,1 名患者(4%)因 GI-ADR 停止使用 ETN,4 名患者(16%)因 GI-ADR 调整剂量。在 DREAM 登记处,8 例 GI-ADR(73%)导致 ETN 停药。在这两个数据源中,ETN 的 GI-ADR 频率与 ADA 的 GI-ADR 频率没有显著差异(荷兰生物监测:ETN 8.7% vs ADA 5.3%, = 0.07;DREAM:ETN 2.8% vs ADA 4.7%, = 0.16)。
大多数与 ETN 相关的 GI-ADR 与胃肠道症状有关。这些不良反应可能导致剂量调整或 ETN 停药。与 ETN 相关的 GI-ADR 频率与 ADA 相关的 GI-ADR 频率相当。了解这些以前未知的不良反应可以促进早期识别并改善医患沟通。