Nissen Steven E, Lincoff A Michael, Wolski Kathy, Ballantyne Christie M, Kastelein John J P, Ridker Paul M, Ray Kausik K, McGuire Darren K, Mozaffarian Dariush, Koenig Wolfgang, Davidson Michael H, Garcia Michelle, Katona Brian G, Himmelmann Anders, Loss Larrye E, Poole Matthew, Menon Venu, Nicholls Stephen J
Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Aug 1;6(8):910-917. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1157.
In patients treated with ω-3 fatty acids, it remains uncertain whether achieved levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are associated with cardiovascular outcomes.
To determine the association between plasma levels of EPA and DHA and cardiovascular outcomes in a trial of ω-3 fatty acids compared with corn oil placebo.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated triglyceride levels and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 675 centers (enrollment from October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last visit May 14, 2020).
Participants were randomized to receive 4 g daily of ω-3 carboxylic acid (CA) or an inert comparator, corn oil.
The primary prespecified end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio, adjusted for baseline characteristics, for patients treated with the ω-3 CA compared with corn oil for the top tertile of achieved EPA and DHA plasma levels 12 months after randomization.
Of the 13 078 total participants, 6539 (50%) were randomized to receive ω-3 CA and 6539 (50%) randomized to corn oil. ω-3 Fatty acid levels were available at both baseline and 12 months after randomization in 10 382 participants (5175 ω-3 CA patients [49.8%] and 5207 corn oil-treated patients [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.9] years, 3588 [34.6%] were women, 9025 [86.9%] were White, and 7285 [70.2%] had type 2 diabetes). The median plasma levels at 12 months in ω-3 CA patients were 89 μg/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 46-131 μg/mL) for EPA and 91 μg/mL (IQR, 71-114 μg/mL) for DHA with top tertile levels of 151 μg/mL (IQR, 132-181 μg/mL) and 118 μg/mL (IQR, 102-143 μg/mL), respectively. Compared with corn oil, the adjusted hazard ratios for the highest tertile of achieved plasma levels were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.83-1.16; P = .81) for EPA, and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.86-1.20; P = .85 for DHA. Sensitivity analyses based on changes in plasma and red blood cell levels of EPA and DHA and primary and secondary prevention subgroups showed similar results.
Among patients treated with ω-3 CA, the highest achieved tertiles of EPA and DHA were associated with neither benefit nor harm in patients at high cardiovascular risk.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.
在接受ω-3脂肪酸治疗的患者中,二十碳五烯酸(EPA)或二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)所达到的水平是否与心血管结局相关仍不确定。
在一项将ω-3脂肪酸与玉米油安慰剂进行比较的试验中,确定EPA和DHA的血浆水平与心血管结局之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:一项双盲、多中心试验在675个中心招募了心血管风险高、甘油三酯水平升高且高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低的患者(2014年10月30日至2017年6月14日入组;2020年1月8日研究结束;最后一次访视为2020年5月14日)。
参与者被随机分配接受每日4克的ω-3羧酸(CA)或惰性对照物玉米油。
预先设定的主要终点是心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、非致命性中风、冠状动脉血运重建或需要住院治疗的不稳定型心绞痛的复合终点。主要结局测量指标是随机分组12个月后,对于达到EPA和DHA血浆水平最高三分位数的患者,接受ω-3 CA治疗与接受玉米油治疗相比,根据基线特征调整后的风险比。
在13078名总参与者中,6539名(50%)被随机分配接受ω-3 CA,6539名(50%)被随机分配接受玉米油。10382名参与者(5175名ω-3 CA患者[49.8%]和5207名玉米油治疗患者[50.2%];平均[标准差]年龄为62.5[8.9]岁,3588名[34.6%]为女性,9025名[86.9%]为白人,7285名[70.2%]患有2型糖尿病)在基线和随机分组12个月后都有ω-3脂肪酸水平数据。ω-3 CA患者在12个月时EPA的血浆中位数水平为89μg/mL(四分位间距[IQR],46 - 131μg/mL),DHA为91μg/mL(IQR,71 - 114μg/mL),最高三分位数水平分别为151μg/mL(IQR,132 - 181μg/mL)和118μg/mL(IQR,102 - 143μg/mL)。与玉米油相比,达到的血浆水平最高三分位数的调整后风险比,EPA为0.98(95%置信区间,0.83 - 1.16;P = 0.81),DHA为1.02(95%置信区间,0.86 - 1.20;P = 0.85)。基于EPA和DHA的血浆及红细胞水平变化以及一级和二级预防亚组的敏感性分析显示了相似的结果。
在接受ω-3 CA治疗的患者中,EPA和DHA所达到的最高三分位数水平对心血管风险高的患者既无益处也无害处。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02104817。