Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital &Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):8827-8837. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07981-z. Epub 2021 May 15.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) and mrEMVI after neoadjuvant therapy (ymrEMVI) in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.
A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out up to June 2020. Studies that evaluated mrEMVI, used treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, and reported survival were included. The time-to-event outcomes (OS and DFS rates) are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). If the HR was not reported in the study, it was calculated from the survival curve using methods according to Parmar's recommendation. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
A total of 2237 patients from 11 studies were included, and the pooled analysis of the overall results from eight studies showed that patients who were mrEMVI positive at baseline had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) (random-effects model: HR = 2.50 [1.84, 3.14]; Z = 5.83, p < 0.00001). The pooled analysis of the overall results from six studies showed that patients who were ymrEMVI positive following neoadjuvant therapy had significantly worse DFS (random-effects model: HR = 2.24 [1.73, 2.90], Z = 6.12, p < 0.00001). Patients with mrEMVI positivity at baseline were also associated with worse overall survival (OS) (random-effects model: HR = 1.93 [1.36, 2.73]; Z = 3.71, p < 0.00001).
mrEMVI and ymrEMVI positivity are poor prognostic factors for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. The precise evaluation of EMVI may contribute to designing individualised treatments and improving patient outcomes.
• Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is a prognostic factor for rectal cancer. • MRI can be used to evaluate EMVI status before (mrEMVI) and after neoadjuvant therapy (ymrEMVI). • The evaluation of mrEMVI and ymrEMVI in neoadjuvant therapy would provide an early assessment of patient prognosis.
本荟萃分析旨在评估接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者中 MRI 检测到的外膜血管侵犯(mrEMVI)和新辅助治疗后 mrEMVI(ymrEMVI)的预后价值。
系统检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 6 月。纳入评估 mrEMVI、使用新辅助治疗并报告生存结局的研究。采用风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示时间依赖性结局(OS 和 DFS 率)。如果研究中未报告 HR,则根据 Parmar 建议的方法从生存曲线中计算。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估荟萃分析中纳入研究的方法学质量。
共纳入 11 项研究的 2237 例患者,8 项研究的汇总分析结果显示,基线时 mrEMVI 阳性的患者疾病无进展生存(DFS)显著更差(随机效应模型:HR=2.50[1.84, 3.14];Z=5.83,p<0.00001)。6 项研究的汇总分析结果显示,新辅助治疗后 ymrEMVI 阳性的患者 DFS 显著更差(随机效应模型:HR=2.24[1.73, 2.90],Z=6.12,p<0.00001)。基线时 mrEMVI 阳性的患者总生存(OS)也较差(随机效应模型:HR=1.93[1.36, 2.73];Z=3.71,p<0.00001)。
mrEMVI 和 ymrEMVI 阳性是接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者的不良预后因素。EMVI 的精确评估可能有助于制定个体化治疗方案,改善患者结局。
• 外膜血管侵犯(EMVI)是直肠癌的预后因素。• MRI 可用于评估新辅助治疗前(mrEMVI)和新辅助治疗后的 EMVI 状态(ymrEMVI)。• 新辅助治疗中 mrEMVI 和 ymrEMVI 的评估可为患者预后提供早期评估。