Suppr超能文献

超声引导下骶管阻滞与超声引导下阴部神经阻滞在包皮环切术中术后镇痛效果的比较。

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of US-guided caudal block and US-guided pudendal nerve block in circumcision.

作者信息

Ozen Volkan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14366. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14366. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and postoperative complications of the pudendal nerve block (PNB) and caudal block (CB) with ultrasound (US).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

METHODS

This study was included male patients aged between 4 and 12 years in the ASA I-II group and scheduled for circumcision. A low-dose CB or US-guided PNB was administered under general anaesthesia before the operation. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Postoperative analgesic need was also noted.

RESULTS

The study was completed with a total of 100 patients consisting of 50 patients who received a CB and 50 who received a PNB. Intraoperative block failure was not seen in any patient. The mean CHEOPS score (P < .001) and the 6th (P = .003) and 12th hours (P < .001) CHEOPS scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in the CB group. There were no postoperative side effects in the PNB group with a statistically significant difference compared with the CB group (P = .027).

CONCLUSION

This first prospective study in the literature shows that US-guided PNB provided a more pronounced and longer analgesic effect and resulted in less requirement for postoperative analgesics than US-guided CB.

摘要

目的

比较超声引导下阴部神经阻滞(PNB)和骶管阻滞(CB)的术后镇痛效果及术后并发症。

研究设计

一项前瞻性观察研究。

方法

本研究纳入年龄在4至12岁、ASA I-II级、计划行包皮环切术的男性患者。在手术前全身麻醉下给予低剂量CB或超声引导下PNB。使用东安大略儿童医院疼痛量表(CHEOPS)和面部疼痛量表修订版评估术后疼痛。记录术后镇痛需求。

结果

本研究共纳入100例患者,其中50例接受CB,50例接受PNB。所有患者术中均未出现阻滞失败。CB组的平均CHEOPS评分(P <.001)以及第6小时(P =.003)和第12小时(P <.001)的CHEOPS评分在统计学上显著更高。PNB组无术后副作用,与CB组相比有统计学显著差异(P =.027)。

结论

文献中的这项首次前瞻性研究表明,超声引导下PNB比超声引导下CB提供了更显著、更持久的镇痛效果,且术后镇痛需求更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验