Centre for Infectious Disease Control, 10206National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
CoRPS, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, 7899Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Int J STD AIDS. 2021 Oct;32(11):1004-1013. doi: 10.1177/09564624211013670. Epub 2021 May 16.
This study aimed to assess whether educational level is an independent determinant for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among clients consulting Dutch sexual health centres (SHCs). With data from the National STI surveillance database (2015-2017), generalized estimating equations corrected for (sexual) risk factors were used to estimate associations between educational level and chlamydia and gonorrhoea among women ( 146,020), heterosexual men ( 82,882) and men who have sex with men (MSM) ( 52,149) and syphilis and HIV among MSM. Compared to the highest educational level (bachelor/master), all lower educational levels were associated with gonorrhoea among women (adjusted odds ratio 1.40; 95% CI 1.18-1.66 for higher general/pre-university level to 3.57; 95% CI 2.66-4.81 for no education/elementary school level) and heterosexual men (respectively 1.36; 1.06-1.74 to 3.84; 2.89-5.09). Women with no education/elementary school level (1.37; 1.17-1.62) and heterosexual clients with (pre-)vocational secondary educational level were more likely to test positive for chlamydia (women: 1.43; 1.39-1.48 and heterosexual men: 1.31; 1.26-1.37) than clients with higher general/pre-university level or bachelor/master level. In MSM, (pre-)vocational secondary educational level was associated with chlamydia (1.16; 1.11-1.22), gonorrhoea (1.15; 1.10-1.21) and syphilis (1.18; 1.08-1.29), and both (pre-)vocational secondary educational level (1.48; 1.25-1.76) and no education/elementary school level (1.81; 1.09-3.00) were associated with HIV. Lower educational levels were independent determinants of STI in SHC clients. Sexual health centres could facilitate STI testing and care among lower educated people by prioritizing their access.
本研究旨在评估教育水平是否是荷兰性健康中心(SHC)就诊者性传播感染(STI)的独立决定因素。利用国家 STI 监测数据库(2015-2017 年)的数据,使用校正了(性)危险因素的广义估计方程,估计了教育水平与衣原体和淋病之间的关联,淋病患者包括女性(146020 例)、异性恋男性(82882 例)和男男性接触者(MSM)(52149 例),梅毒和 HIV 患者包括 MSM(52149 例)。与最高教育水平(学士/硕士)相比,所有较低教育水平均与女性的淋病相关(调整后的优势比 1.40;95%CI 1.18-1.66 为较高的普通/大学预科水平至 3.57;95%CI 2.66-4.81 为无教育/小学水平)和异性恋男性(分别为 1.36;1.06-1.74 至 3.84;2.89-5.09)。没有接受教育/小学教育的女性(1.37;1.17-1.62)和接受(职业)中等教育的异性恋客户更有可能检测出衣原体阳性(女性:1.43;1.39-1.48 和异性恋男性:1.31;1.26-1.37)比具有较高普通/大学预科或学士/硕士水平的客户。在 MSM 中,(职业)中等教育水平与衣原体(1.16;1.11-1.22)、淋病(1.15;1.10-1.21)和梅毒(1.18;1.08-1.29)有关,(职业)中等教育水平(1.48;1.25-1.76)和无教育/小学水平(1.81;1.09-3.00)与 HIV 有关。较低的教育水平是 SHC 就诊者 STI 的独立决定因素。性健康中心可以通过优先考虑他们的获得途径,促进教育程度较低的人接受 STI 检测和护理。