Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil; Department of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Veterinary physician, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Jun;101:103418. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103418. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
This study proposes a standardized image analysis method for assessing horse conformation. A total of 34 adult American Quarter Horses (mean age = 6.7 ± 2.9 years, body weight = 489 ± 44 kg) were used. Reference angular measurements were performed using a digital goniometer, and reference linear measurements were determined using a standard measuring tape. For image analysis, photographs from the animal's left profile were taken at a distance of 3 m using eight markers to facilitate visualization. Images were processed using ImageJ software. Reference and estimated values showed great accuracy, with v < 1%, Pearson's correlation coefficient > 0.999 (P < .001), and coefficient of variation < 2.70. Image analysis and reference results were similar (P > .05) for most variables. The highest coefficient of variation (3.05%) was observed for coxae-femur angle, where the software obtained an underestimation of 2.8° compared with the reference method. Body length resulted in an overestimation of 3.4 cm in relation to reference values, but coefficient of variation was low (1.54%). Discrepancies between estimated and reference results can be attributed to possible errors when collecting biometric data using portable measuring tools, angles and long measurements being more difficult to obtain. Software analysis of standardized horse photographs is an accurate and precise method for obtaining body measurements and is therefore recommended for future studies on horse conformation.
本研究提出了一种评估马体结构的标准化图像分析方法。共使用了 34 匹成年美国夸特马(平均年龄=6.7±2.9 岁,体重=489±44 公斤)。使用数字量角器进行参考角度测量,使用标准卷尺进行参考线性测量。为了进行图像分析,在距离 3 米的位置从动物的左侧轮廓拍摄照片,使用八个标记来方便可视化。使用 ImageJ 软件处理图像。参考值和估计值具有很高的准确性,v<1%,Pearson 相关系数>0.999(P<.001),变异系数<2.70。对于大多数变量,图像分析和参考结果相似(P>.05)。在髋骨-股骨角度方面,变异系数最高(3.05%),与参考方法相比,软件获得的低估值为 2.8°。与参考值相比,体长的估计值高估了 3.4 厘米,但变异系数较低(1.54%)。估计值和参考结果之间的差异可能归因于使用便携式测量工具收集生物测量数据时可能出现的误差,角度和长测量更难获得。对标准化马照片进行软件分析是一种获取身体测量值的准确且精确的方法,因此建议在未来的马体结构研究中使用。