• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当意外变得可预期时会发生什么:流行音乐中随时间变化的和声惊喜与偏好

What to Expect When the Unexpected Becomes Expected: Harmonic Surprise and Preference Over Time in Popular Music.

作者信息

Miles Scott A, Rosen David S, Barry Shaun, Grunberg David, Grzywacz Norberto

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

Secret Chord Laboratories, Norfolk, VA, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 30;15:578644. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.578644. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2021.578644
PMID:33994972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8121146/
Abstract

Previous work demonstrates that music with more chords tends to be perceived as more enjoyable than music with more conventional harmonic structures. In that work, harmonic surprise was computed based upon a static distribution of chords. This would assume that harmonic surprise is constant over time, and the effect of harmonic surprise on music preference is similarly static. In this study we assess that assumption and establish that the relationship between harmonic surprise (as measured according to a specific time period) and music preference is not constant as time goes on. Analyses of harmonic surprise and preference from 1958 to 1991 showed increased harmonic surprise over time, and that this increase was significantly more pronounced in preferred songs. Separate analyses showed similar increases over the years from 2000 to 2019. As such, these findings provide evidence that the human perception of tonality is influenced by exposure. Baseline harmonic expectations that were developed through listening to the music of "yesterday" are violated in the music of "today," leading to preference. Then, once the music of "today" provides the baseline expectations for the music of "tomorrow," more pronounced violations-and with them, higher harmonic surprise values-become associated with preference formation. We call this phenomenon the "Inflationary-Surprise Hypothesis." Support for this hypothesis could impact the understanding of how the perception of tonality, and other statistical regularities, are developed in the human brain.

摘要

先前的研究表明,和弦较多的音乐往往比具有更传统和声结构的音乐更令人愉悦。在该研究中,和声惊喜是基于和弦的静态分布来计算的。这意味着和声惊喜在时间上是恒定的,并且和声惊喜对音乐偏好的影响同样是静态的。在本研究中,我们评估了这一假设,并确定随着时间的推移,和声惊喜(根据特定时间段来衡量)与音乐偏好之间的关系并非恒定不变。对1958年至1991年期间的和声惊喜和偏好进行分析后发现,随着时间的推移,和声惊喜有所增加,而且这种增加在受欢迎的歌曲中更为明显。单独的分析表明,2000年至2019年期间也有类似的增长。因此,这些发现提供了证据,证明人类对调性的感知受到接触的影响。通过聆听“过去”的音乐形成的基线和声预期在“现在”的音乐中被打破,从而产生偏好。然后,一旦“现在”的音乐为“未来”的音乐提供了基线预期,更明显的预期打破——以及随之而来的更高的和声惊喜值——就会与偏好形成相关联。我们将这种现象称为“膨胀惊喜假说”。对这一假说的支持可能会影响对人类大脑中调性感知以及其他统计规律是如何形成的理解。

相似文献

1
What to Expect When the Unexpected Becomes Expected: Harmonic Surprise and Preference Over Time in Popular Music.当意外变得可预期时会发生什么:流行音乐中随时间变化的和声惊喜与偏好
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 30;15:578644. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.578644. eCollection 2021.
2
A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Harmonic Surprise and Preference in Popular Music.流行音乐中谐波惊喜与偏好之间关系的统计分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 18;11:263. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00263. eCollection 2017.
3
Uncertainty and Surprise Jointly Predict Musical Pleasure and Amygdala, Hippocampus, and Auditory Cortex Activity.不确定性和惊喜共同预测音乐愉悦感以及杏仁核、海马体和听觉皮层的活动。
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4084-4092.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.067. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Surprise-related activation in the nucleus accumbens interacts with music-induced pleasantness.伏隔核中的与惊喜相关的激活与音乐引起的愉悦感相互作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 17;14(4):459-470. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz019.
5
Harmonic Structure Predicts the Enjoyment of Uplifting Trance Music.和声结构预测振奋人心的迷幻舞曲的受欢迎程度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:1999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01999. eCollection 2016.
6
Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.音乐中音调组织的演变反映了感知现实的符号表征。第一部分:史前时期。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 16;6:1405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01405. eCollection 2015.
7
A case of auditory agnosia with impairment of perception and expression of music: cognitive processing of tonality.一例伴有音乐感知和表达障碍的听觉失认症:调性的认知加工
Eur Neurol. 2007;58(2):70-7. doi: 10.1159/000103640. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
8
Young children pause on phrase boundaries in self-paced music listening: The role of harmonic cues.幼儿在自主聆听音乐时会在短语边界停顿:和声线索的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2018 May;54(5):842-856. doi: 10.1037/dev0000405. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
Harmonic and rhythmic influences on musical expectancy.和声与节奏对音乐期待的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Sep;56(3):313-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03209765.
10
Neural networks for harmonic structure in music perception and action.用于音乐感知与行动中和声结构的神经网络。
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:454-464. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.作为归一化香农熵的感知复杂性
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;27(2):166. doi: 10.3390/e27020166.
2
Trajectories and revolutions in popular melody based on U.S. charts from 1950 to 2023.基于 1950 年至 2023 年美国排行榜的流行旋律轨迹和革命。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):14749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64571-x.
3
A model of time-varying music engagement.时变音乐参与模型。

本文引用的文献

1
A Theoretical Framework for How We Learn Aesthetic Values.关于我们如何学习审美价值的理论框架。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 11;14:345. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00345. eCollection 2020.
2
Neural and physiological data from participants listening to affective music.参与者在聆听情感音乐时的神经和生理数据。
Sci Data. 2020 Jun 15;7(1):177. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0507-6.
3
Brain Connectivity Networks and the Aesthetic Experience of Music.脑连接网络与音乐的审美体验
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0421. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Does Amount of Information Support Aesthetic Values?信息量是否支持审美价值?
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 22;16:805658. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.805658. eCollection 2022.
Brain Sci. 2018 Jun 12;8(6):107. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8060107.
4
A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Harmonic Surprise and Preference in Popular Music.流行音乐中谐波惊喜与偏好之间关系的统计分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 18;11:263. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00263. eCollection 2017.
5
Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception.对本土亚马逊人的不和谐音的漠不关心揭示了音乐感知中的文化差异。
Nature. 2016 Jul 28;535(7613):547-50. doi: 10.1038/nature18635. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
The evolution of popular music: USA 1960-2010.流行音乐的演变:美国1960 - 2010年
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 May 6;2(5):150081. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150081. eCollection 2015 May.
7
Network science and the effects of music preference on functional brain connectivity: from Beethoven to Eminem.网络科学与音乐偏好对大脑功能连接的影响:从贝多芬到阿姆
Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 28;4:6130. doi: 10.1038/srep06130.
8
Probabilistic models of expectation violation predict psychophysiological emotional responses to live concert music.概率模型的期望违反预测心理生理情绪反应现场音乐会音乐。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Sep;13(3):533-53. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0161-y.
9
Predictive information processing in music cognition. A critical review.音乐认知中的预测信息处理。批判性评价。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):164-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10
Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?信息论能否为感官处理提供一种生态学理论?
Network. 2011;22(1-4):4-44. doi: 10.3109/0954898X.2011.638888.