• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing the Success Rate and Side Effects of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Varicose Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较下肢静脉曲张腔内激光消融术和射频消融术的成功率及副作用:一项随机临床试验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Fall;11(Suppl 1):S43-S48. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.S7. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
2
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.对于小隐静脉曲张,腔内消融治疗(激光或射频)或泡沫硬化疗法与传统手术修复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD010878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2.
3
A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Superficial Venous Incompetence: Two Year Follow up Results.一项比较丁基氰基丙烯酸酯、射频消融和静脉内激光消融治疗浅静脉功能不全的随机临床试验:两年随访结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;56(4):553-560. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study).前瞻性对比队列研究评估射频分段消融或 1470nm 腔内激光消融联合放射状光纤治疗大隐静脉反流(Varico 2 研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jan;6(1):31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins.随机对照临床试验:静脉腔内激光消融术与直接和间接射频消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):998-1004. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11187. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm).激光和射频消融研究(LARA 研究):一项比较射频消融和静脉内激光消融(810nm)的随机研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;40(2):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.026.
7
Comparison of Bare-Tip and Radial Fiber in Endovenous Laser Ablation with 1470 nm Diode Laser.1470纳米二极管激光腔内激光消融中裸光纤与径向光纤的比较
Ann Vasc Dis. 2014;7(3):239-45. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.14-00081. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
8
Comparative study between endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with 1940 nm versus EVLA with 1470 nm for treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein and short saphenous vein: A randomized controlled trial.1940纳米与1470纳米静脉内激光消融治疗大隐静脉和小隐静脉功能不全的对比研究:一项随机对照试验。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101960. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101960. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period.下肢浅静脉功能不全的腔内热消融术:7年单中心3000例肢体治疗经验
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):500-5. doi: 10.1583/09-2750.1.
10
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trial.泡沫硬化疗法、静脉腔内激光消融术和手术治疗静脉曲张的临床疗效及成本效益:激光、手术和泡沫硬化疗法比较(CLASS)随机对照试验的结果
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(27):1-342. doi: 10.3310/hta19270.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiofrequency venous ablation for symptomatic relief in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: a case series.射频静脉消融术缓解体位性直立性心动过速综合征症状:病例系列
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jan 23;8(2):ytae029. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae029. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Endovenous radiofrequency ablation vs laser ablation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: A meta-analysis.静脉内射频消融与激光消融治疗下肢静脉曲张患者的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Sep;12(5):101842. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101842. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
3
Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency.静脉曲张和静脉功能不全的治疗策略与挑战
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 26;10(18):5946-5956. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.5946.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards.CEAP 分类系统和报告标准 2020 年更新版。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 May;8(3):342-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.075. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Comparison of Endovenous Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Varices in the Same Patient.同一患者静脉内激光与射频消融治疗静脉曲张的比较。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Winter;8(1):13-16. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.03. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
3
Comparison of ultrasound-guided endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency for the varicose veins treatment: An updated meta-analysis.超声引导下静脉腔内激光消融与射频治疗静脉曲张的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Mar;39:267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.080. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
4
Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein versus high ligation: long-term results.大隐静脉腔内激光消融术与高位结扎术:长期结果
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Mar;29(2):765-71. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1389-z. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Endovenous laser therapy in the treatment of lower-limb venous ulcers.腔内激光治疗下肢静脉溃疡。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 May;21(5):657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.029.
6
A new gold standard for varicose vein treatment?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
7
Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study).
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
8
Current incidence of peripheral arterial embolism and role of echocardiography.外周动脉栓塞的当前发病率及超声心动图的作用
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008 Dec;16(6):439-43. doi: 10.1177/021849230801600602.
9
Epidemiology of chronic venous disease.慢性静脉疾病的流行病学
Phlebology. 2008;23(3):103-11. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2007.007061.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration, endovenous laser therapy, and foam sclerotherapy for primary varicosis.原发性静脉曲张腔内射频消融、腔内激光治疗和泡沫硬化疗法的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2008 Apr;49(2):213-33.

比较下肢静脉曲张腔内激光消融术和射频消融术的成功率及副作用:一项随机临床试验

Comparing the Success Rate and Side Effects of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Varicose Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Mohammadi Tofigh Arash, Tahmasebi Hamed, Zebarjadi Javad

机构信息

Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Fall;11(Suppl 1):S43-S48. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.S7. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

DOI:10.34172/jlms.2020.S7
PMID:33995968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956030/
Abstract

Varicosis is a condition affecting the superficial venous system of the lower limbs. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is a minimally invasive method that uses different frequencies of laser for treatment. Radiofrequency (RF) has also been effectively used for vein ablation through thermal mechanisms. This study compares the success rate and side effects of EVLA and RF to treat varicose veins in the lower limbs within 12 months. In this two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled, single-blind study, 1090 patients with lower limb varicosis proven by Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) were randomly placed into one of the two groups: EVLA and RF ablation. In the EVLA group, we used a 980-nm diode laser in a pulse mode and in the RF group, a 7-cm ClosureFast (Covidien, USA) catheter with an RF generator. We assessed pain during the operation and 8 and 24 hours after the surgery by the numerical rating scale (NRS). The patients were followed up on day 7, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The presence or absence of pain and then the severity of pain (according to NRS), the recurrence rate, complications, and the length of the procedure were compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the patients' characteristics, major adverse events and pain severity during the procedure and 8 and 24 hours after the surgery. According to NRS, the mean chronic pain severity in the EVLA group was 3.99± 0.754 versus 4.50± 0.657 in the RF group, and the difference was not significant. The length of operation and the recurrence rate 12 months after the procedure were not significantly different. The results of our study further establish the efficacy of EVLT and RF ablation for lower limb varicosis treatment without any significant difference in the clinical outcomes and complications during a 12-months follow-up.

摘要

静脉曲张是一种影响下肢浅静脉系统的病症。静脉腔内激光消融术(EVLA)是一种微创方法,使用不同频率的激光进行治疗。射频(RF)也已通过热机制有效地用于静脉消融。本研究比较了EVLA和RF在12个月内治疗下肢静脉曲张的成功率和副作用。在这项双臂、平行组、随机对照、单盲研究中,1090例经多普勒超声检查(DUS)证实患有下肢静脉曲张的患者被随机分为两组之一:EVLA组和RF消融组。在EVLA组中,我们使用脉冲模式的980纳米二极管激光,在RF组中,使用带有射频发生器的7厘米ClosureFast(美国科惠医疗)导管。我们通过数字评分量表(NRS)评估手术期间以及术后8小时和24小时的疼痛情况。患者在术后第7天、然后在术后3个月、6个月和12个月进行随访。比较有无疼痛情况以及疼痛的严重程度(根据NRS)、复发率、并发症和手术时长。两组患者的特征、主要不良事件以及手术期间、术后8小时和24小时的疼痛严重程度无显著差异。根据NRS,EVLA组的平均慢性疼痛严重程度为3.99±0.754,而RF组为4.50±0.657,差异不显著。手术时长和术后12个月的复发率无显著差异。我们的研究结果进一步证实了EVLT和RF消融治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效,在12个月的随访期间临床结果和并发症方面无任何显著差异。