Suppr超能文献

[腹部占位性病变经皮穿刺的细针和切开活检技术]

[Fine-needle and incisional biopsy technics in the percutaneous puncture of abdominal space-occupying lesions].

作者信息

Berger H, Permanetter W, Steiner W, Markl A

机构信息

Radiologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität München.

出版信息

Radiologe. 1988 Jun;28(6):265-8.

PMID:3399672
Abstract

Cutting needles for guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal tumors have been introduced in recent years and provide better results than fine-needle aspiration. A total of 292 biopsies in 273 patients were evaluated retrospectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 83.4% with cutting needles and 54.4% for fine-needle aspiration. The sensitivity in detection of malignancy was 86.8% and 88.6%, respectively. The location of the lesion to be biopsied determined whether CT or US was used for guidance. US control was used in biopsies of the upper abdomen; CT was preferred for guidance in the retroperitoneal space and in the pelvis. The caliber of the cutting needles in transperitoneal or transintestinal biopsy was limited to 19 gauge. The complication risk using cutting needles up to 18 gauge is no higher than for fine-needle aspiration biopsy if suitable access routes are selected.

摘要

用于腹部肿瘤经皮引导活检的切割针近年来已被引入,其效果优于细针穿刺抽吸活检。对273例患者的292次活检进行了回顾性评估。切割针的诊断准确率为83.4%,细针穿刺抽吸活检的诊断准确率为54.4%。检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性分别为86.8%和88.6%。待活检病变的位置决定了是使用CT还是超声进行引导。上腹部活检采用超声引导;腹膜后间隙和盆腔活检则首选CT引导。经腹膜或经肠活检时,切割针的口径限制为19号。如果选择合适的进针路径,使用18号及以下切割针的并发症风险不高于细针穿刺抽吸活检。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验