Suppr超能文献

超声心动图三尖瓣反流梯度用于筛查肺动脉高压新定义的有效性。

Validity of echocardiographic tricuspid regurgitation gradient to screen for new definition of pulmonary hypertension.

作者信息

Gall Henning, Yogeswaran Athiththan, Fuge Jan, Sommer Natascha, Grimminger Friedrich, Seeger Werner, Olsson Karen M, Hoeper Marius M, Richter Manuel J, Tello Khodr, Ghofrani Hossein Ardeschir

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Klinikstrasse 32, 35392, Germany.

Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen , Germany.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Apr 5;34:100822. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100822. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently an echocardiographic threshold for the tricuspid regurgitation gradient (TRG) of > 31 mmHg is recommended for screening for pulmonary hypertension (PH). Invasively diagnosed PH was recently redefined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg instead of ≥ 25 mmHg. We investigated the ability of TRG to screen for the new PH-definition.

METHODS

Retrospective assessment of echocardiography and right heart catheterisation data from 1572 patients entering the Giessen PH-Registry during 2008-2018. Accuracy of different TRG thresholds and other echocardiographic parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

FINDINGS

1264 patients fulfilled the new PH-definition. Positive (PPV) and negative predictive values and accuracy of TRG > 46 mmHg were 95%, 39%, and 73%, respectively, for the new PH-definition. Lowering the TRG cut-off to 31 mmHg and below worsened PPV to ≤ 89%. The PPV of TRG for pre-capillary PH (mPAP > 20 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥ 3 Wood Units) was ≤ 85%. In patients with TRG ≤ 46 mmHg, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/TRG and TRG/right ventricular outflow tract acceleration time were superior to TRG in screening for newly defined pre-capillary PH.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with suspected PH referred to a tertiary care centre, the PPV of TRG to meet the new PH-definition depended strongly on the TRG cut-off used. Our data do not support lowering the TRG cut-off. Combining TRG with other echocardiographic parameters might improve the validity of echocardiographic screening for PH.

摘要

背景

目前推荐使用三尖瓣反流压差(TRG)> 31 mmHg的超声心动图阈值来筛查肺动脉高压(PH)。最近,有创诊断的PH被重新定义为平均肺动脉压(mPAP)> 20 mmHg,而非≥ 25 mmHg。我们研究了TRG筛查新的PH定义的能力。

方法

回顾性评估2008年至2018年期间进入吉森PH注册研究的1572例患者的超声心动图和右心导管检查数据。使用受试者工作特征曲线评估不同TRG阈值和其他超声心动图参数的准确性。

结果

1264例患者符合新的PH定义。对于新的PH定义,TRG > 46 mmHg的阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值及准确性分别为95%、39%和73%。将TRG临界值降至31 mmHg及以下会使PPV恶化至≤ 89%。TRG对毛细血管前性PH(mPAP > 20 mmHg且肺血管阻力≥ 3伍德单位)的PPV≤ 85%。在TRG≤ 46 mmHg的患者中,三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移/TRG和TRG/右心室流出道加速时间在筛查新定义的毛细血管前性PH方面优于TRG。

解读

在转诊至三级医疗中心的疑似PH患者中,TRG符合新PH定义的PPV很大程度上取决于所使用的TRG临界值。我们的数据不支持降低TRG临界值。将TRG与其他超声心动图参数相结合可能会提高超声心动图筛查PH的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c51/8102717/c8369e3a50c4/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验