• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并发日程安排:每个强化物的反应次数如何影响强化敏感性的估计。

Concurrent schedules: How responses per reinforcer affects estimates of sensitivity to reinforcement.

机构信息

The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jul;116(1):114-123. doi: 10.1002/jeab.694. Epub 2021 May 17.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.694
PMID:33997983
Abstract

Conventionally, when choice is measured under concurrent schedules, all responses are included. However, the class of all responses consists of 2 sub-classes which are discriminable by their properties: Reinforced responses always equal obtained reinforcers, while unreinforced responses are free to vary. As a result, the inclusion of reinforced responses in choice measures results in sensitivity values in generalized matching that are biased toward larger values, and this bias becomes extreme in some combinations of overall response and reinforcer rates. Different ways of varying concurrent-schedule values also affect estimated sensitivity and the linearity between choice based on all responses and reinforcer ratios. To avoid spurious results and comparisons, and as a matter of good practice, generalized-matching fits and measures should be done using only unreinforced responses.

摘要

传统上,当在并行时间表下测量选择时,会包括所有的反应。然而,所有反应的类别由两个子类组成,它们可以根据其属性来区分:强化反应始终等于获得的强化物,而未强化反应则可以自由变化。因此,在选择测量中包含强化反应会导致广义匹配中的敏感性值偏向于更大的值,并且这种偏差在某些总反应和强化物率的组合中变得极端。改变并行时间表值的不同方法也会影响基于所有反应和强化物比率的选择的估计敏感性和线性关系。为了避免虚假结果和比较,并且作为良好实践的一部分,应该仅使用未强化反应来进行广义匹配拟合和测量。

相似文献

1
Concurrent schedules: How responses per reinforcer affects estimates of sensitivity to reinforcement.并发日程安排:每个强化物的反应次数如何影响强化敏感性的估计。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jul;116(1):114-123. doi: 10.1002/jeab.694. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.斑马鱼的选择行为对强化物的频率、即时性和大小比例敏感。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Sep;116(2):182-207. doi: 10.1002/jeab.709. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
3
Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.并发式程序中对相对强化率的敏感性:与相对和绝对强化持续时间无关。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jan;75(1):25-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-25.
4
Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.鸽子和人类在并发链强化程序下的选择决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):97-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-97.
5
Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.信号强化:信号可靠性对有信号和无信号备选方案之间选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2020 May;174:104088. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104088. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.并发程序安排:强化物的短期和长期影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):257-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-257.
7
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.在多个选项中进行选择:相对强化率和总体强化率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.考察强化物在同时呈现的程序中的辨别和增强作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):227-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-227.
9
Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.在四个选项之间的稳态选择遵循恒定比例规则。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jul;104(1):7-19. doi: 10.1002/jeab.157. Epub 2015 May 18.
10
Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.在选择动态过程中对大鼠进行固定和取样。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.57-05.