Suppr超能文献

在选择动态过程中对大鼠进行固定和取样。

Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.

作者信息

Aparicio Carlos F, Baum William M

机构信息

University of Guadalajara-CUCS-CEAA, Antigua Escuela de Medicina, Hospital # 230, Jalisco, México.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.57-05.

Abstract

The generality of the molar view of behavior was extended to the study of choice with rats, showing the usefulness of studying order at various levels of extendedness. Rats' presses on two levers produced food according to concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules. Seven different reinforcer ratios were arranged within each session, without cues identifying them, and separated by blackouts. To alternate between levers, rats pressed on a third changeover lever. Choice changed rapidly with changes in component reinforcer ratio, and more presses occurred on the lever with the higher reinforcer rate. With continuing reinforcers, choice shifted progressively in the direction of the reinforced lever, but shifted more slowly with each new reinforcer. Sensitivity to reinforcer ratio, as estimated by the generalized matching law, reached an average of 0.9 and exceeded that documented in previous studies with pigeons. Visits to the more-reinforced lever preceded by a reinforcer from that lever increased in duration, while all visits to the less-reinforced lever decreased in duration. Thus, the rats' performances moved faster toward fix and sample than did pigeons' performances in previous studies. Analysis of the effects of sequences of reinforcer sources indicated that sequences of five to seven reinforcers might have sufficed for studying local effects of reinforcers with rats. This study supports the idea that reinforcer sequences control choice between reinforcers, pulses in preference, and visits following reinforcers.

摘要

行为的摩尔观点的一般性被扩展到对大鼠选择的研究中,这表明在不同扩展水平上研究秩序是有用的。大鼠对两个杠杆的按压根据并发可变间隔-可变间隔时间表产生食物。在每个实验环节中安排了七种不同的强化物比率,没有线索来识别它们,并且通过停电来分隔。为了在杠杆之间交替,大鼠按压第三个转换杠杆。选择随着成分强化物比率的变化而迅速改变,并且在强化率较高的杠杆上发生更多的按压。随着持续的强化物,选择逐渐朝着强化杠杆的方向转移,但随着每一个新的强化物转移得更慢。根据广义匹配定律估计,对强化物比率的敏感度平均达到0.9,超过了先前对鸽子研究中记录的敏感度。来自强化杠杆的强化物之前对强化程度更高的杠杆的访问持续时间增加,而对强化程度较低的杠杆的所有访问持续时间减少。因此,与先前研究中鸽子的表现相比,大鼠的表现朝着固定和取样的方向移动得更快。对强化物来源序列效应的分析表明,五到七个强化物的序列可能足以研究大鼠强化物的局部效应。这项研究支持了强化物序列控制强化物之间的选择、偏好脉冲以及强化物之后的访问的观点。

相似文献

1
Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.57-05.
2
Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jan;79(1):87-109. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-87.
3
Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Jan;81(1):85-127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-85.
4
Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):274-95. doi: 10.1002/jeab.170. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
5
Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):37-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.114-04.
6
Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):257-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-257.
7
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004.
8
Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
Behav Processes. 2009 Sep;82(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
9
Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):11-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.11-05.
10
Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):1-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-1.

引用本文的文献

2
Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Sep;98(2):199-212. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-199.
3
Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):101-24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101.
4
Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):227-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-227.
5
Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):175-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-175.
6
Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):161-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-161.
8
Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 May;91(3):293-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-293.
9
Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):301-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-301.
10
Local effects of delayed food.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice, contingency discrimination, and foraging theory.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):355-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-355.
2
Optimality And Concurrent Variable-interval Variable-ratio Schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):75-89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-75.
3
Nonstable concurrent choice in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):219-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-219.
4
Comparing Locomotion With Lever-press Travel In An Operant Simulation Of Foraging.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):177-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-177.
6
Matching, maximizing, and hill-climbing.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):321-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-321.
7
Concurrent schedules: Spatial separation of response alternatives.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):35-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-35.
8
Choice, changeover, and travel.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):35-49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-35.
9
Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):21-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-21.
10
Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):431-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-431.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验