• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在亚急性和慢性脑卒中患者中,执行功能性活动的生物力学策略是否存在差异?

Are biomechanical strategies to perform functional activities different between individuals with subacute and chronic stroke?

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, Brazil.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(1):95-101. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210027.

DOI:10.3233/NRE-210027
PMID:33998552
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if the capacity to perform functional mobility activities change within the first year post-stroke using the Timed "Up and Go" Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with thirty-eight stroke individuals. A motion analysis system was used during the Timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test to evaluate the following activities: sit-to-stand, gait, turn, and stand-to-sit. Kinematic variables related to each activity were obtained in addition to TUG-ABS scores. The ability to perform the activities was compared between subacute (up to 3 months post-stroke, n = 21) and chronic participants (4 to 12 months post-stroke, n = 17) using Mann-Whitney U tests (α= 5%).

RESULTS

Results were expressed as median difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). TUG-ABS scores: Sit-to-stand (MD = 0, 95% CI = 0.0 to 1), gait (MD = 0, 95% CI = 0.0 to 1), stand-to-sit (MD = 0, 95% CI = 0.0 to 1), and total score (MD = 2.0, 95% CI = 0.0 to 6) were not different between groups. Subacute participants presented significant better scores during turn activity (MD = 2.0, 95% CI 0.0 to 2.0). All kinematic variables were not different between participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Capacity to perform functional activities was not different within the first year post-stroke, suggesting that biomechanical strategies are developed within the first three months following stroke.

摘要

目的

使用 Timed "Up and Go" 评估生物力学策略(TUG-ABS)评估卒中后第一年患者的功能性移动能力是否发生变化。

方法

本研究为横断面研究,共纳入 38 名卒中患者。在 Timed "Up and Go"(TUG)测试中使用运动分析系统评估以下活动:从坐到站、步态、转身和从站到站坐。除 TUG-ABS 评分外,还获得与每项活动相关的运动学变量。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验(α=5%)比较亚急性(卒中后 1 个月内,n=21)和慢性(卒中后 4-12 个月,n=17)参与者之间的活动能力。

结果

结果表示为中位数差值(MD)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。TUG-ABS 评分:从坐到站(MD=0,95%CI=0.0-1)、步态(MD=0,95%CI=0.0-1)、从站到站坐(MD=0,95%CI=0.0-1)和总分(MD=2.0,95%CI=0.0-6)在组间无差异。亚急性组在转身活动中表现出明显更好的评分(MD=2.0,95%CI 0.0-2.0)。所有运动学变量在参与者之间均无差异。

结论

卒中后一年内,功能性活动能力无差异,提示生物力学策略在卒中后三个月内发展。

相似文献

1
Are biomechanical strategies to perform functional activities different between individuals with subacute and chronic stroke?在亚急性和慢性脑卒中患者中,执行功能性活动的生物力学策略是否存在差异?
NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(1):95-101. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210027.
2
Postural control of individuals with chronic stroke compared to healthy participants: Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Reach Test and center of pressure movement.慢性脑卒中患者与健康参与者的姿势控制比较:计时起立行走测试、功能性伸展测试和压力中心移动。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):685-693. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04522-1. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
3
Clinical testing of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: the Timed “Up and Go” Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke.对一种评估生物力学策略的创新工具的临床测试:用于中风患者的定时“站起和行走”评估生物力学策略(TUG-ABS)。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):241-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1106.
4
Development and validation of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: the Timed "Up and Go" - Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke.开发和验证一种用于评估生物力学策略的创新工具:用于中风患者的计时“站起和行走” - 评估生物力学策略(TUG-ABS)。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):232-40. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1107.
5
Gait parameters predicted by Timed Up and Go performance in stroke patients.通过卒中患者定时起立行走测试表现预测的步态参数。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):73-80. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141194.
6
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy for lower limbs on measurements of functional mobility and postural balance in subjects with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.强制性运动疗法对中风患者下肢功能移动性和姿势平衡测量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Dec;24(8):555-561. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1366011. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Parallel walk test: its correlation with balance and motor functions in people with chronic stroke.平行行走测试:其与慢性中风患者平衡和运动功能的相关性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):877-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
Effect of foot placements during sit to stand transition on timed up and go test in stroke subjects: A cross sectional study.中风患者从坐到站转换过程中足部位置对计时起立行走测试的影响:一项横断面研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):355-362. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161423.
10
Use of an instrumented dual-task timed up and go test in children with traumatic brain injury.使用仪器化双重任务计时起立行走测试评估创伤性脑损伤患儿。
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 12.